Avicena y Anselmo de Canterbury. En torno al argumento ontológico.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Las similitudes entre el argumento ontológico de Anselmo de Canterbury y los argumentos empleados por Avicenna para la demostración de la existencia de Dios se pusieron de relieve en la primera mitad del siglo XX. Nos detenemos en un análisis de dos capítulos de la tercera parte (Metafísica) del al-Ishārāt wal-Tanbīhāt (Orientaciones y advertencias) de Avicena y en los capítulos II-IV del Proslogion de Anselmo, aportando una nueva interpretación sobre sus afinidades.
The similarities between the ontological argument of Anselm of Canterbury and the arguments that Avicenna used in his demonstration for the existence of God have been highlighted since the first half of the 20th century. We focus on two chapters of the third part (Metaphysics) of Avicenna’s al-Ishārāt wal-Tanbīhāt (Remarks and Admonitions) and chapters II-IV of Anselm’s Proslogion, providing a new interpretation of their affinities.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work provided that authorship of the work and its initial publication in this journal are acknowledged.
-
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal (for example, depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided that its initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and earlier as well as increased citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).