Pedro Humánez-Berral 5
Hikma 25 (1) (2026), 1 - 25
to increase through DAT (Talaván, 2013), potentially due to factors such as
the engaging nature of audiovisual texts or the integration of technology. In
addition to enhancing engagement and motivation, DAT has been shown to
improve ICT competencies (Tinedo-Rodríguez, 2023b) owing to the
continuous use of specialised software and online platforms. Moreover, the
content of audiovisual texts has led researchers to identify DAT as a means
of raising gender awareness (Tinedo-Rodríguez, 2024; Zaragoza-Ninet and
Ricart-Vayá, 2020) or intercultural awareness (Incalcaterra-McLoughlin et al.,
2020; Sanz-Moreno, 2023). This was further corroborated by
Rodríguez-Arancón (2023), who found that learners demonstrated enhanced
cultural awareness in both their L1 and L2. Additionally, that study revealed
that learners perceived an improvement in their critical thinking skills as a
result of engaging in various DAT tasks, a perspective also shared by
language instructors who have implemented DAT in their teaching practices
(Incalcaterra-McLoughlin et al., 2020). Furthermore, DAT has been used as a
tool to foster creativity among learners (Ogea-Pozo and Ruiz-Espejel, 2024),
with some scholars proposing didactic strategies for language instructors to
integrate into their pedagogical approaches (Tinedo-Rodríguez, 2023a).
The linguistic and non-linguistic outcomes associated with DAT may
vary depending on the AVT modality employed (Talaván, 2020), as different
modalities possess distinct characteristics (Chaume Varela, 2004).
Alonso-Pérez and Sánchez-Requena (2018) classify AVT modalities used in
DAT into two primary categories: 1) subtitling and 2) revoicing. The subtitling
modalities include intertitling, standard subtitling, surtitling, subtitling for the
deaf and hard of hearing, respeaking-based subtitling, fansubbing, and 3D
subtitling. The revoicing modalities, as identified by the authors, encompass
dubbing, voice-over, free commentary, narration, audio description,
simultaneous and consecutive interpreting, as well as other forms such as
karaoke, audio-subtitling, and fandubbing (Alonso-Pérez and
Sánchez-Requena, 2018). In subtitling modalities, learners generate subtitles,
whereas in revoicing modalities, they produce audio tracks (Talaván, 2020).
Consequently, the final product in DAT tasks is either written (subtitles) or
spoken (revoicing). However, DAT tasks can be designed to incorporate both
written and oral skills, irrespective of the chosen modality. Given that this
study focuses on free commentary and narration, the outcomes associated
with revoicing modalities will be examined.
1.2. Didactic revoicing
Didactic revoicing is defined as the “recording of a new audio track for
a particular video on the part of the [FL] students” (Talaván, 2020, p. 573). As
outlined in the previous subsection, didactic revoicing encompasses various
modalities, with dubbing being the most widely used activity.