Integrating animals in the classroom: The attitudes and experiences of Australian school teachers toward animal-assisted interventions for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Main Article Content

Bradley P Smith
Ashley A Dale


The introduction of animals into school classrooms has been posited as a beneficial intervention for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).  Whilst evidence that animal-assisted interventions or activities can positively influence classroom behaviour and learning outcomes is emerging, little is known about the experiences and attitudes of those who implement it. We presented a series of open and close-ended questions via an online survey to Australian school teachers working with students on the autistic spectrum. Whether teachers had experienced companion animals in the classroom or not, companion animals were believed to provide a means for improving social skills and engagement within the classroom, as well as decreasing stress, anxiety, and the occurrence of problematic behaviours. Yet, despite an overall positive attitude, and 68% having had animals or pets in their classroom, only 16% of respondents had experience with ‘formal’ animal-assisted interventions. Explanations for why both formal and informal animal-assisted interventions were either not being adopted, or was not currently being considered, included a lack of knowledge, lack of support and resources, reactions of the student in relation to allergies and behaviour, and issues relating to animal welfare. It was also acknowledged that the evidence-base for animal-assisted interventions for students with ASD is currently lacking, and that such interventions were not suitable for all students, or all classroom situations. Moving forward, it is important that the inclusion of companion animals and more formal based animal intervention programs in classrooms be adequately designed and evaluated, because implementing or promoting time consuming and financially costly strategies without the evidence is problematic.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Research papers
Author Biography

Bradley P Smith, Central Queensland University

Senior Lecturer in Psychology

School of Human Health and Social Sciences

Central Queensland University 


American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.

Anderson, K.L., and Olson, M.R. 2006. The value of a dog in a classroom of children with severe emotional disorders. Anthrozoös 19: 35-49. doi: 10.2752/089279306785593919.

Ascione, F.R., and Weber, C.V. 1996. Children’s attitudes about the humane treatment of animals and empathy: One-year follow-up of a school-based intervention. Anthrozoös 9: 188–195. doi: 10.2752/089279396787001455

Australian Companion Animal Council. 2010. Contribution of the pet care industry to the Australian Economy. 7th edn. Accessed on November 16, 2015.

Beetz, A. 2013. Socio-emotional correlates of a school dog-teacher-team in the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1-7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00886

Berry, A., Borgi, M., Francia, N., Alleva, E., and Cirulli, F. 2013. Use of assistance and therapy dogs for children with autism spectrum disorders: A critical review of the current evidence. The Journal of Alternative and Complimentary Medicine 19: 73-80. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0835

Braun, V., and Clarke, C. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carlisle, G.K. 2015. The social skills and attachment to dogs of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45: 1137-1145. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2267-7.

Daly, B., and Suggs, S. 2010. Teachers' experiences with humane education and animals in the elementary classroom: implications for empathy development. Journal of Moral Education 39: 101-112. doi: 10.1080/03057240903528733

Friesen, L., and Delisle. E. 2012. Animal-assisted literacy. Childhood Education 88: 102-107. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2012.662124

Grandgeorge, M., Tordjman, S., Lazartigues, A., Lemonnier, E., Deleau, M., Hausberger, M., and Young, L. 2012. Does pet arrival trigger prosocial behaviors in individuals with autism? PLoS ONE 7: 1-8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041739

Grandin, T., Fine, A. H., & Bowers, C. M. 2010. The use of therapy animals with individuals with autism. In Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice (3rd ed), 247–264, ed. A.H. Fine San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Green, J., Willis, K., Hughes, E., Small, R., Welch, N., Gibbs, L., and Daly, J. 2007. Generating best evidence from qualitative research: The role of data analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 31: 545–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00141.x

Hergovich, A., Monshi, B., Semmier, G and Ziegler, V. 2002. The effects and presence of a dog in the classroom. Anthrozoös 15: 37-50. doi: 10.2752/089279302786992775

Jalongo, M., Astorino, T., and Bomboy, N. 2004. Canine Visitors: The influence of therapy dogs on young children's learning and well-being in classrooms and hospitals. Early Childhood Education Journal 32: 9-16. doi: 10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000039638.60714.5f

Jalongo, M. 2005. What are all these dogs doing at school? Using therapy dogs to promote children's reading practice. Childhood Education 81: 152-158. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2005.10522259

Kasari, C., and Smith, T. 2013. Interventions in schools for children with autism spectrum disorder: Methods and recommendations. Autism 17: 254-267. doi: 10.1177/1362361312470496

Kotrschal, K. and Ortbauer, B. 2003. Behavioural effects of the presence of a dog in a classroom. Anthrozoös 16: 147-159. doi: 10.2752/089279303786992170

Kršková, L., Talarovičová, A., and Olexová, L. 2010. Guinea pigs—The "Small Great" therapist for autistic children, or: do guinea pigs have positive effects on autistic child social behavior? Society and Animals 18: 139-151. doi: 10.1163/156853010X491999

Ladarola S, Hetherington S, Clinton C, Dean M, Reisinger E, Huynh L, Locke J, Conn K, Heinert S, Kataoka S, Harwood R, Smith T, Mandell DS, Kasari C. 2015. Services for children with autism spectrum disorder in three, large urban school districts: Perspectives of parents and educators. Autism 19: 694-703. doi: 10.1177/1362361314548078

Nimer, J., and Lundahl, B. 2007. Animal-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös 20: 225-238. doi: 10.2752/089279307X224773

O'Haire, M. 2013. Animal-assisted intervention for autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43: 1606-1622. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1707-5.

O’Haire, M.E., McKenzie, S.J., Beck, A.M., and Slaughter, V. 2013. Social skills increase in children with autism in the presence of animals compared to toys. PLoS ONE 8: e57010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057010

O'Haire, M.E., McKenzie, S.J., McCune, S., and Slaughter, V. 2014. Effects of classroom animal-assisted activities on social functioning in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 20: 162-168. doi: 10.1089/acm.2013.0165

Prothmann, A., Ettrich, C., and Prothmann, S. 2009. Preference for, and responsiveness to, people, dogs and objects in children with autism. Anthrozoös 22: 161-171. doi: 10.2752/175303709X434185

Roth, L. 2013. Autism spectrum disorder, Briefing Paper No 5/2013. NSW Parliamentary Research Service. ISBN 978-0-7313-1901-5. Retrieved from$File/Autism%20Spectrum%20Disorder.briefing%20paper.pdf. Accessed on November 16, 2015.

Rud Jr., A.G., and Beck, A.M. 2003. Companion animals in Indiana elementary schools. Anthrozoös 16: 241-251. doi: 10.2752/089279303786992134

Silva, K., Correia, R., Lima, M., Magalhães, A., and de Sousa, L. 2011. Can dogs prime autistic children for therapy? Evidence from a single case study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 17: 655-659. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0436.

Smyth, C., and Slevin, E. 2010. Experiences of family life with an autism assistance dog. Learning Disability Practice 13: 12-17. doi: 10.7748/ldp2010.