Comparative study between Latin America Geoparks and Sites of Geological Interest A view from geotourism
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of geological heritage is being used for the development of environmentally friendly tourism modalities. This work aims to compare the situation of Latin American geoparks (Araripe, Grutas del Palacio, Mixteca Alta, Comarca Minera, Colca and Volcanes de Andagua, Kütralkura, Imbabura, as well as Río Coco) with some relevant geological sites (Cuevas from Nerja, Grand Canyon National Park, Mammoth Cave and Giant's Causeway). The modality that is approached is geotourism. Six variables were defined for the study through the Expert Method (year, extension, country, types of activities, annual tourists and income from tourist activities). The research concludes that the situation of the geoparks of Latin America, with respect to the sites of geological interest, from geotourism, is not the most satisfactory, so positive experiences in this area should be taken advantage of and adapted to the conditions of each country, in order to contribute to the conservation of the geological, geomorphological and cultural heritage. This study is part of the results of a research project, so it should be continued, presenting viable development alternatives to the Imbabura Geopark Board of Directors.
Keywords: Geoparks, Latin America, sites of geological interest, geotourism.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright Notices Proposed by Creative Commons
Proposed policy for journals offering deferred open access
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
1. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY-NC 4.0 (Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 ) hird parties to share the work provided that its author and its first publication is indicated this journal and no commercial use is made.
2. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematics file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication is indicated in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematics files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html.