Esse or Existence? The Real Distinction between Lawrence Dewan and Étienne Gilson

Main Article Content

Manuel Alejandro Serra Pérez

Abstract

One of the most debated issues in the period immediately following the death of Thomas Aquinas was how to interpret faithfully according to his texts the concept of esse, given the particular metaphysical quality that it acquired in this new ontology. Bearing in mind that the scholastic thinkers tried to use philosophy as an instrument to explain Christian faith, the understanding of esse as distinct from essence, was the center of the debate for being the reason of the main argument to state the ontological difference between God and creatures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
12%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
UCOPress

Article Details

How to Cite
Serra Pérez , M. A. . (2020). Esse or Existence? The Real Distinction between Lawrence Dewan and Étienne Gilson. Revista Española De Filosofía Medieval, 26(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v26i2.12656
Section
ARTICLES