Analysis of the impact on academic results in mathematics following the implementation of the scientific scope program
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The introduction of the "ámbitos" program in Spain, through the Organic Law of Education, allows for the integration of subjects in primary and secondary education, facilitating a multidisciplinary approach. This method addresses methodological and socio-emotional aspects, which are crucial in the transition to secondary education. Although academic literature lacks studies on "ámbitos" at this level, international experiences support its effectiveness. A study conducted analyzes whether "ámbitos" affect academic outcomes in mathematics during the first and second years of Compulsory Secondary Education (ESO). The results indicate that while a significant improvement was observed in 1º ESO, no statistically significant differences were found in 2º ESO, suggesting that the positive impact of the "ámbitos" might be more limited to certain levels. These investigations could enhance educational quality, aligning with global debates on curricular integration and teacher training.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Common License (CC BY 3.0 ES)
References
Auer, C. (2023). BIOMATH 2023 International Conference and School for Young Scientists: A Personal View. Biomath Communications, 10(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.55630/bmc.2023.08.287
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Cozzens, M. B., & Roberts, F. S. (2011). Biomath in the Schools. American Mathematical Society.
Da Silva, T. G., De Andrade, A. M., Caluzi, J. J., y Nardi, R. (2004). Interdisciplinaridade: concepções de professores da área ciências da natureza em formação em serviço. Ciência & Educação, 10(2), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132004000200009
Drake, S. M., y Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50.
Eccles, J. S., y Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
Gabric, K. (2011). The awakening of a high school biology teacher to the BioMath connection. M. B. Cozzens, Fred S. Roberts (Eds) In BioMath in the Schools (pp.109-112).
Griffin, L., Dodds, P., y Rovegno, I. (1996). Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teachers: Integrate Everything You Know to Help Students Learn. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(9), 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1996.10604857
Isorna, M., Navia, C., y Felpeto, M. (2013). La transición de la Educación Primaria a la Educación Secundaria: sugerencias para padres. Innovación educativa, 23, 161-177.
Maass, K., Geiger, V., y Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-14.
Margot, K. C., y Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2-13.
Marsteller, P., de Pillis, L., Findley, A., Joplin, K., Pelesko, J., Nelson, K., Thompson, K., Usher, D., y Watkins, J. (2017). Toward integration: From quantitative biology to mathbio-biomath? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-03-0053
McPhail, G. (2018). Curriculum Integration in the Senior Secondary School: A Case Study in A National Assessment Context. Journal of Curriculum Studies 50 (1). 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1386234
Montoya, M. M., y De Diego, M. (2000). Del mamut a la hamburguesa: una propuesta de trabajo para el ámbito sociolingüístico. Cuadernos de pedagogía, 293, 82-86.
Navarro, C. (2006). Los Programas de Diversificación Curricular: ¿qué opinan los alumnos que los han cursado? Revista española de pedagogía, 64(233), 123-141.
Niemelä, M. (2022). Subject matter specific curriculum integration: a quantitative study of finnish student teachers’ integrative content knowledge. Journal of Education for Teaching: JET, 48(2), 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1989288
Nikitina, S. (2006). Three Strategies for Interdisciplinary Teaching: Contextualizing, Conceptualizing, and Problem-Centring. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38 (3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500422632
Pratt, S. y George, R. (2005). Transferring friendship: girls’ and boys’ friendships in the transition from primary to secondary school. Children & Society, 19(1), 16-26
Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H.-H., y Park, M. S. (2021). Is the STEM pipeline universal? Variation in STEM access and awareness across secondary students. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1921-1943.
Sebastián Fabuel, V. (2015). Una reflexión sobre las transiciones educativas. De primaria a secundaria: ¿Traspaso o acompañamiento? Edetania, 48, 159-183.
Tonkin, S. y Watt, H. (2003). Self-concept over the transition from primary to secondary school: A case study on a program for girls. Educational Research, 13(2), 27-54.
Torrego, L., y Leal, P. (2009). Estudio evaluativo de casos sobre el ámbito científico y tecnológico de los programas de diversificación curricular. Educacion y diversidad, 3, 195-218.
Vitikka, E., Krokfors, L,. y Rikabi, L. (2016). The Finnish National Core Curriculum: Design and Development. In Miracle of Education: The Principles and Practices of Teaching and Learning in Finnish Schools, edited by Hannele Niemi, Auli Toom, and Arto Kallioniemi, pp (83-90). 2nd ed. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers