The 'Summa Halensis' on the Composition of the Human Body
Main Article Content
Abstract
The author of the Summa Halensis claims that the human body is maximally composite and argues for this using a proof strategy that intends to deduce the body’s composition from the human soul’s immateriality. This study examines that claim and argument, which is given both in a shorter and a longer form. The core of the article consists in a careful reconstruction of both forms, along with an enquiry into its Jewish Neoplatonic sources (first and foremost the Fons vitae) and its appearance in zoological commentaries contemporary to the Summa written by Peter of Spain and Albert the Great. It emerges that the argument brings into play various features of the Summist’s hylomorphic theory, especially a pluralism about substantial forms.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Bibliography
Primary sources
Albertus Magnus, De caelo et mundo, edited by P. Hossfeld, Opera omnia 5.1 (Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 1971).
Albertus Magnus, De causis et processu universitatis a prima causa, edited by W. Fauser, Opera omnia 17.2 (Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 1993).
Albertus Magnus, Quaestiones super libris De animalibus, edited by E. Filthaut, Opera omnia 12 (Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 1951).
Alexander de Hales, Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica (SH), vol. II (Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1928-1948).
Avicebron, Fons vitae, edited by C. Baeumker, Avencebrolis (Ibn Gabirol) Fons vitae ex arabico in latinum translatus ab Iohanne Hispano et Dominico Gundissalino (Münster: Aschendorff, 1895).
Isaac Israeli, “Liber de elementis”, in Omnia opera Ysaac, vol. 1 (Lyon, 1515). Available in: https://www.arabic-latin-corpus.philosophie.uni-wuerzburg.de/text/Isaac_Elem_la.index.xhtml.
Joannes de Rupella, Summa de anima, edited by J. Guy Bougerol (Paris: Librairie Philosophique Vrin, 1995).
Peter of Spain, Questiones super libro De animalibus Aristotelis, edited by F. Navarro Sánchez (London: Routledge, 2016).
Secondary sources
Asúa, Miguel J. C. de, “Medicine and Philosophy in Peter of Spain’s Commentary on De Animalibus”, in Aristotle’s Animals in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, edited by C. Steel, G. Guldentops, and P. Beullens (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999), 189-211.
Bieniak, Magdalena, The Soul-Body Problem at Paris, Ca. 1200–1250, translated by R. Roncarati (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2010).
Bieniak, Magdalena, “The Soul-Body Union in the Summa Halensis”, in The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought, edited by L. Schumacher (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021), 37-48.
Cantarino, Vincent, “Ibn Gabirol’s Metaphysic of Light”, Studia Islamica 26 (1967), 49-71.
Dold, Dominic, “Why Do Animals Have Parts? Organs and Organisation in 13th- and 14th-Century Latin Commentaries on Aristotle’s De Animalibus”, in Fragmented Nature: Medieval Latinate Reasoning on the Natural World and Its Order, edited by M. Cipriani and N. Polloni (New York: Routledge, 2022).
Doucet, Victorin, “Prolegomena in librum III necnon in libros I et II Summae Fratris Alexandri”, in Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica, vol. IV (Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1948).
Goldstein-Préaud, Tamara, “Albert le Grand et les questions du XIIIe siècle sur le ‘De animalibus’”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 3/1 (1981): 61-71.
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus, “The Early Albertus Magnus and His Arabic Sources on the Theory of the Soul”, Vivarium 46/3 (2008): 232-252.
Köhler, Theodor W, Homo animal nobilissimum: Konturen des spezifisch Menschlichen in der naturphilosophischen Aristoteleskommentierung des dreizehnten Jahrhunderts. Teilband 2 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).
Lottin, Dom Odon, “La composition hylémorphique des substances spirituelles: Les débuts de la controverse”, Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 34 (1932): 21-41.
Macken, Raymond, “Le statut philosophique de la matière selon Bonaventure”, Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 47 (1980): 188-230.
Parisoli, Luca, La Summa fratris Alexandri e la nascita della filosofia politica francescana: riflessioni dall’ontologia delle norme alla vita sociale (Palermo: Officina di Studi Medievali, 2008).
Polloni, Nicola, The Twelfth-Century Renewal of Latin Metaphysics: Gundissalinus’s Ontology of Matter and Form (Toronto: PIMS, 2020).
Pontes, José María da Cruz, A obra filosófica de Pedro Hispano Portugalense (Coimbra: Publicacões do Instituto de estudios filosóficos, 1972).
Rossi, Pietro, “L’entrata dei libri De animalibus nel Medioevo latino”, in La zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione dall’età ellenistica e romana alle culture medievali. Atti del convegno, edited by M. M. Sassi, E. Coda, and G. Feola (Pisa: Pisa University Press, 2018), 237-268.
Saccenti, Riccardo, “The Reception of the Summa Halensis in the Manuscript Tradition Until 1450”, in The Reception of the Summa Halensis in the Manuscript Tradition Until 1450 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021), 353–372.
Schumacher, Lydia, Human Nature in Early Franciscan Thought: Philosophical Background and Theological Significance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023).
Schumacher, Lydia (ed.), The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021).
Schumacher, Lydia (ed.), The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020).
Schumacher, Lydia (ed.), The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020).
Sturlese, Loris, “L’Epitome Campililiensis del Fons vitae di Avicebron. Note sul testo e sulla tradizione manoscritta”, in Palaeographica, diplomatica et archivistica: studi in onore di Giulio Battelli, edited by G. Battelli (Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 1979), 429-453.
Twetten, David, Steven Baldner, and Steven C. Snyder, “Albert’s Physics”, in A Companion to Albert the Great: Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, edited by I. M. Resnick (Leuven: Brill, 2013), 173-220.
Wallace, William A., “Albertus Magnus and the Suppositional Necessity in the Natural Sciences”, in Albertus Magnus and the Sciences. Commemorative Essays 1980, edited by J. A. Weisheipl (Toronto: PIMS, 1983), 103-128.
Ward, Thomas M., John Duns Scotus on Parts, Wholes, and Hylomorphism (Leiden: Brill, 2014).
Wei, Ian P., Thinking about Animals in Thirteenth-Century Paris: Theologians on the Boundary Between Humans and Animals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Weisheipl, James A., “Albertus Magnus and Universal Hylomorphism: Avicebron”, The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10/3 (1979): 239-260.
Zavalloni, Roberto (ed.), Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des forms; textes inédits et étude critique (Louvain: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur Philosophie, 1951).