The Two-Wills Theory in the Franciscan Tradition: Questioning an Anselmian Legacy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The medieval Franciscan John Duns Scotus famously distinguished between two different wills, which are characterized by an affection for advantage or happiness and an affection for justice. He identified the source of his theory in the earlier medieval thinker, Anselm of Canterbury, who first articulated the distinction. This article will demonstrate, however, that there is significant disparity between Anselm and Scotus’ understanding of the two wills. To this end, the article will explore the two wills theory articulated by Scotus’ predecessors, Alexander of Hales and John of La Rochelle, who together composed the so-called Summa Halensis, the founding text of the Franciscan intellectual tradition. These authors drew on John of Damascus’ distinction between thelesis and boulesis to delineate the theory that Scotus attributed to Anselm. However, their theory was just as distant from the Damascene’s original understanding as Scotus’ was from Anselm. In demonstrating this, the article seeks to highlight the originality of the Franciscan theory while at the same time allowing its sources to be interpreted on their own terms.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Primarily Sources
Alexander of Hales, “De libero arbitrio”, in Magestri Alexandri de Hales Quaestiones disputatae ‘Antequam esset frater’, vol. 1 (Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1960).
Anselm of Canterbury, Monologion, Prologue, in The Major Works, edited by G.R. Evans and B. Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Anselm of Canterbury, De Concordia (DC), in The Major Works, edited by G.R. Evans and B. Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Anselm of Canterbury, On the Fall of the Devil (FD), in The Major Works, edited by G.R. Evans and B. Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Anselm of Canterbury, On the Virgin Conception and Original Sin (VC), in The Major Works, edited by G.R. Evans and B. Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Augustine, City of God, Books VIII-XVI (DCD), translated by G. G. Walsh and G. Monahan, in The Fathers of the Church (Washington: D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1952).
Augustine, Confessions, translated by H. Chadwick (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Augustine, De doctrina Christiana (DDC), 1.4, translated by J. J. Gavigan, in The Fathers of the Church (Washington: D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2002).
Augustine, De Trinitate (DT), translated by S. McKenna, in The Fathers of the Church (Washington: D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, repr; 2002).
Jean of La Rochelle, Tractatus de divisione multiplici potentiarum animae: texte critique avec introduction, notes et tables, edited by P. Michaud-Quantin (Paris: Vrin, 1964).
John of La Rochelle, Summa de anima, edited by J. Guy Bougerol (Paris: Vrin, 1995).
John of Damascus, De fide orthodoxa: Versions of Burgundio and Cerbanus, edited by E. M. Buytaert (St Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute, 1955). Translated by E.W. Watson and L. Pullan, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 9, edited by P. Schaff and H. Wace (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1899).
Secondary Sources
Adelman, Frederick J., “The Theory of Will in St John Damascene”, in The Quest for the Absolute, edited by F. J. Adelman (Chestnut Hill: Boston College, 1966).
Cross, Richard, “The Reception of John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis”, in The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context, edited by L. Schumacher (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020), 71-90.
Dixon, Thomas, From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Drummond, Ian, “John Duns Scotus on the Passions of the Will”, in Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by M. Pickavé and L. Shapiro (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 53-74.
Frede, Michael, “John of Damascus on Human Action, the Will, and Human Freedom”, in Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources, edited by K. Ierodiakonou (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002), 63-95.
Gauthier, R.A., “Saint Maxime le Confesseur et la psychologie de l’acte humain”, Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 21 (1954): 51-100.
Irwin, Terence, “Scotus: Will, Freedom, and Reason”, in The Development of Ethics, vol. 1: From Socrates to the Reformation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 654-678.
King, Peter, “Scotus’s Rejection of Anselm: The Two-Wills Theory”, in John Duns Scotus 1308-2008, edited by L. Honnefelder et al. (Munster: Aschendorff: 2010), 359-378.
Knuuttila, Simo, Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Lottin, Odon, Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles, 6 vols, vol. 1 (Gembloux: J. Duculot, 1948-1960).
Saccenti, Riccardo, Conservare la retta volontà: L’atto morale nelle dottrine di Filippo il Cancelliere e Ugo di Saint-Cher (1225-1235) (Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino, 2013).
Schumacher, Lydia, “Free Choice”, in Human Nature in Early Franciscan Thought: Philosophical Background and Theological Significance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023), 249-275.
Schumacher, Lydia, “The Affections”, in Human Nature in Early Franciscan Thought: Philosophical Background and Theological Significance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023), 228-248.
Sorabji, Richard, Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Templtation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Williams, Thomas, “The Libertarian Foundations of Scotus’s Moral Philosophy”, The Thomist 62 (1998): 193-215.
Zavattero, Irene, “Voluntas est duplex: La dottrina della voluntà dell’anonimo commentario di Parigi sull’ethica Nova e Vetus (1235-40)”, Medioevo 40 (2015): 65-96.