La radical negación de Juan Bonifacio Bagatta (1649-1702): 'Superfluus est Intellectus Agens' / The Radical Denial of Juan Bonifacio Bagatta (1649-1702): 'Superfluus est Intellectus Agens'
Main Article Content
Abstract
En este trabajo se estudia el parecer de Juan Bonifacio Bagatta (s. XVII) sobre el intelecto agente. Niega su existencia porque admite que las especies sensibles son inteligibles en acto y pueden incidir directamente en el intelecto posible; porque éste y la fantasía están unidos en el alma y lo que afecta a una potencia afecta a las demás. Al final se expone porque estas tesis son incorrectas.
This article examines the interpretation by Iohannis Bonifacio Baggatta (17th century) of the agent intellect. He denies its existence, because he accepts that sensitive species are intelligible in act and can affect directly the possible intellect. This is because the possible intellect and the imagination are united in the soul, and what affects one power also affects other. The article concludes by showing the reason these theses are incorrect.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Publication Facts
Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers
0
2.4
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability
N/A
16%
External funding
N/A
32%
Competing interests
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted
15%
33%
Days to publication
74
145
Indexed in
-
—
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
How to Cite
SELLÉS DAUDER, J. F. (2017). La radical negación de Juan Bonifacio Bagatta (1649-1702): ’Superfluus est Intellectus Agens’ / The Radical Denial of Juan Bonifacio Bagatta (1649-1702): ’Superfluus est Intellectus Agens’. Revista Española De Filosofía Medieval, 24, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v24i.10460
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
Proposed Policy for Journals that Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Since issue 33 and for the future issues, it is the policy of the publisher that authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).