Unde venit malum in angelum, qui bonus erat. Hermenéutica de dos textos anselmianos / Unde venit malum in angelum, qui bonus erat. Hermeneutics of Two Anselmian Texts

Main Article Content

María R. FISCHER

Abstract

The article takes into account two short ansalmien texts: the penultimate chapter of his book De Casu Diaboli which be long to the Corpus Doctrinale and the Oratio ad Sanctam Crucem which is part ofthe Corpus Spirituale. Even though both texts imply a certain familiarity with the work of Saint Anselm, the reader can find a thematic continuity that allows him to re fer the absurdity of the existan ce determined by the fatalism of evil to the severity of the love of Christ on his cross. The road becomes even worst because for the believer, the memory of a Middle Age to which the Revelation was the guarantee of the true humanity is still alive. However the contemporary thinker, despite the narrowness of roads can find a height and clarity that demonstrate the genuine reality ofthe world. Such is the intention behind the hermeneutics ofthese texts that we offer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
14%
33%
Days to publication 
3050
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
UCOPress

Article Details

How to Cite
FISCHER, M. R. (2008). Unde venit malum in angelum, qui bonus erat. Hermenéutica de dos textos anselmianos / Unde venit malum in angelum, qui bonus erat. Hermeneutics of Two Anselmian Texts. Revista Española De Filosofía Medieval, 15, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v15i.6200
Section
ARTICLES