'Virtus' y 'species' en la filosofía de la naturaleza de Roger Bacon (c. 1220-1293)

Contenido principal del artículo

Yael Kedar

Resumen

El artículo analiza el uso que Roger Bacon hace del concepto de virtus en los Communia naturalium y De multiplication specierum. Nos centramos en el papel que desempeñan la virtus y las especies como transmisores de la causalidad en el reino de lo inanimado. Se analizan las distintas funciones que desempeña la virtus en el movimiento de las esferas celestes, la fuerza del lugar natural, la atracción del hierro por el imán y la naturaleza universal. El análisis concluye que la virtus es un poder eficiente, una característica de la forma capaz de provocar el movimiento local y de instigar los procesos naturales. La especie es la respuesta de la materia a la estimulación realizada por la virtus a través de la cual se realiza toda acción natural, con exclusión del movimiento local. La especie es una potencia no eficiente, un “apetito” interno de la materia. Es una expresión de la inclinación inherente a la materia para promoverse y perfeccionarse, el resultado de la “potencialidad activa” de la materia.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Sección
ARTÍCULOS

Bibliografía

Primary Sources

Al‐Bitrūjī, De motibus celorum, edited by F. J. Carmody, Al‐Bitrūjī, De motibus celorum. Critical Edition of the Latin Translation of Michael Scot (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1952).

Al‐Bitrūjī, On the Principles of Astronomy, translated by B. A. Goldstein (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1971).

Aristotle, Physics, translated by J. Barnes, The Complete Works of Aristotle – The Revised Oxford Translation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), vol. 1.

Aristotle, On the Heavens, translated by J. Barnes, The Complete Works of Aristotle – The Revised Oxford Translation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), vol. 1, 447-511.

Bacon, Roger, Communia naturalium, edited by R. Steele, 3 vols., Opera hactenus inedita II-IV, II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1910-1913).

Bacon, Roger, De multiplicatione specierum, edited and translated by D. C. Lindberg, Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature: A Critical Edition, with English Translation, Introduction and Notes, of De multiplicatione specierum and De speculis comburentibus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).

Bacon, Roger, Perspectiva, edited and translated by D.C. Lindberg, Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages: A Critical Edition, with English Translation of Bacon’s Perspectiva with Introduction and Notes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).

Bacon, Roger, Opus maius, edited by J. A. Bridges, (Oxford and Edinburgh, 1897-1900, repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1964).

Bacon, Roger, Opus tertium, edited by J. S. Brewer, Opera quedam hactenus inedita (London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, 1859).

Bacon, Roger, Questiones supra libros octo Physicorum Aristotelis, edited by R. Steele, Opera hactenus inedita XIII (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1935).

Secondary Sources

Carmody, Francis, J., Arabic Astronomical and Astrological Sciences in Latin Translation: A Critical Bibliography (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956).

Bodnar, Istvan, “Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/aristotle-natphil/.

Dales, Richard C., “The De-animation of the Heavens in the Middle Ages”, Journal for the History of Ideas 41/4 (1980): 531-550.

Demange, Dominique and Kedar, Yael, “Physical action, species and matter: The debate between Roger Bacon and Peter John Olivi”, Journal for the History of Philosophy 58 (2020): 49-59.

Duhem, Pierre, Le système du monde - histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic (Paris: Hermann, 1914; repr. 1958)

Grant, Edward, The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages – Their Religious, Institutional, and Intellectual Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Grant, Edward, “Cosmology”, in The Cambridge History of Science, 2 (=Medieval Science), edited by D. C. Lindberg and M. H. Shank (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 436-455.

Grant, Edward, “Celestial Motion in the Late Middle Ages”, Early Science and Medicine 2/2 (1997): 129-148.

Hackett, Jeremiah, “Roger Bacon: His Life, Career and Works”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. M. G. Hacked (Leiden: Leiden University Press, 1997), 9-24.

Kedar, Yael, “The Nomological Image of Nature: Explaining the Tide in the Thirteenth Century”, Annals of Science 73/1 (2016): 68-88.

Kedar, Yael and Hon, Giora, “Roger Bacon (c. 1220-1292) and his System of Laws of Nature: Classification, Hierarchy and Significance”, Perspectives on Science 26 (2017): 719-745.

Kennedy, Edward S., “Alpetragius's Astronomy”, Journal for the History of Astronomy 4 (1973): 134-136.

Lang, Helen S., The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics: Place and the Elements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Panti, Cecilia, “Roger Bacon on Chance in Natural Generation in the Questiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis”, in Roger Bacon and Medieval Science and Philosophy – Studies in Honour of Jeremiah Hackett, edited by N. Polloni and Y. Kedar (London: Routledge, 2021) 36-53.

Pasnau, Robert, Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Pereira, Michela, “Remarks on materia naturalis”, in Roger Bacon’s Communia Naturalium: A 13th Century Philosopher’s Workshop, edited by P. Bernardini and A. Rodolfi (Firenze: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2014), 103-138.

Polloni, Nicola, “Roger Bacon on the Conceivability of Matter”, in Roger Bacon and Medieval Science and Philosophy, edited by N. Polloni and Y. Kedar (London: Routledge, 2021), 76-97.

Rodolfi, Anna, “Dicitur materia propriissime et strictissime. Roger Bacon and the Ontological Status of Matter”, in Roger Bacon’s Communia Naturalium: A 13th Century Philosopher’s Workshop, edited by P. Bernardini and A. Rodolfi (Firenze: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2014), 83-102.

Sabra, Abdelhamid I., “The Andalusian Revolt against Ptolemaic Astronomy: Averroes and al‐Biṭrūjī”, in Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences: Essays in Honour of I. Bernard Cohen, edited by E. Mendelsohn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 133-153.

Saliba, George, “Critiques of Ptolemaic Astronomy in Islamic Spain”, Al‐Qanṭara 20 (1999): 3-25.

Tachau, Katherine H., Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham–Optics, Epistemology and the Foundations of Semantics 1250-1345 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1988).

Takahashi, Adam, “Nature, Formative Power and Intellect in the Natural Philosophy of Albert the Great”, Early Science and Medicine 13/5 (2008): 451-481.

Weill-Parot, Nicolas, Points aveugles de la nature – la rationalité scientifique médiévale face à l’occulte, l’attraction magnetique et l’horreur du vide (XIII du XV siècle) (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2013).