Conocimiento y poder: Ciencia en la corte y utilidad política en la obra de Roger Bacon

Contenido principal del artículo

Elly Truitt

Resumen

En sus principales trabajos para el Papa, así como en ciertas obras de madurez, Bacon se centró en la utilidad del conocimiento natural, tanto en términos de saber práctico humano como de lo que ese saber podía producir. Miró a las ciencias practicadas en la corte (como la medicina, la ciencia astral, la óptica y la ciencia de la materia), que privilegian la aplicación y el conocimiento obtenido a través de los sentidos, como fuentes de conocimiento natural y como ejemplos del potencial del conocimiento de la naturaleza. Este ensayo sostiene que la obra de Roger Bacon debe entenderse en el contexto de la corte. El énfasis de Bacon en los dispositivos para la búsqueda del conocimiento y la utilidad demuestra hasta qué punto las ciencias desarrolladas en la corte (la ingeniería, la navegación, la alquimia y la adivinación) se valoraban junto a distintos ámbitos filosóficos tradicionales sobre la naturaleza, y es en este contexto en el que deben ser entendidos. Tanto las ciencias desarrolladas en la corte como la teoría de Bacon sobre la scientia experimentalis se centran en los materiales, el conocimiento sensorial y el conocimiento que persigue fines aplicados de hechos concretos. Bacon se inspiró en las ciencias desarrolladas en la corte para teorizar cómo el conocimiento natural podía servir al poder gobernante. Examinando las principales obras de Bacon sobre la scientia experimentalis y analizando cómo recurre a ejemplos de la historia de Alejandro Magno, este ensayo demuestra la interrelación entre el poder político y el conocimiento erudito, y cómo se entrecruzan practicando y aplicando el experimentum y la tecnología. Por último, el interés de Bacon por la utilidad del conocimiento sugiere que los escenarios cortesanos de este periodo son lugares significativos para el desarrollo y las aplicaciones del conocimiento natural.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Sección
ARTÍCULOS

Bibliografía

Primary Sources

Alexander of Paris, The Medieval French Roman d’Alexandre, vol 2: Alexandre de Paris, edited by E. C. Armstrong, D. L. Buffum, B. Edwards, and L. F. H. Lowe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1937).

Alexander of Paris, Le Roman d’Alexandre, translated by L. Harf-Lancner (Paris: H. Champion, 1994).

Al-Kindi, De radiis, edited by M.-T. d’Alverny and F. Hudry (Paris: J. Vrin, 1975).

Roger Bacon, Opus Maius, edited by J. H. Bridges, 3 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897-1900).

Roger Bacon, Opus Maius, translated by R. Belle Burke, 3 vols. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1928).

Roger Bacon, Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages: A Critical Edition and English Translation of Bacon’s Perspectiva, with an Introduction and Notes, edited and translated by D. Lindberg (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

Roger Bacon, Ruggero Bacone, Filosofia, scienza, teologia dall’Opus Minus, translated by V. Sorge and F. Seller (Rome: Armando, 2010).

Roger Bacon, Ruggero Bacone, La scienza sperimentale Lettera a Clemente IV—La scienza sperimentali—I segreti dell’arte e della natura, translated by F. Bottin (Milan: Rusconi, 1990).

Roger Bacon, Epistola de secretis operibus artis et naturae, et de nullitate magiae, edited by J. S. Brewer, Fr. Rogeri Bacon Opera Quaedam Hactenus Inedita (London: Longman and Green, 1859), 523-551.

Roger Bacon, Compendium Studii Philosophiae, edited by J. S. Brewer, Fr. Rogeri Bacon Opera Quaedam Hactenus Inedita (London: Longman and Green, 1859), 394-519

Roger Bacon, Opus tertium, edited and translated by N. Egel (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2020).

Roger Bacon, Un fragment inédit de l’Opus tertium précédé d’une étude sur ce fragment, edited by P. Duhem (Quarrachi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1909).

Roger Bacon, Opus tertium, edited by A. G. Little, Part of the Opus tertium of Roger Bacon, including a fragment now printed for the first time (Aberdeen: University Press, 1912).

Roger Bacon, Epistola Fratris Rogeri Baconi, edited and translated by E. Bettoni, Lettera a Clemente IV (Milan: Biblioteca Francescana Provinciale, 1964).

Roger Bacon, Frier Bacon: His Discovery of the Miracles of Art, Nature, and Magick. Faithfully translated out of Dr. Dees own Copy, by T. M. and never before in English (London: Simon Miller, 1659).

Epistola Alexandri Macedonis ad Aristotelem magistrum suum de itinere suo et de situ Indiae, edited by W. Walther Boer, Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie (Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1980).

Epistola Alexandri Macedonis ad Aristotelem magistrum suum de itinere suo et de situ Indiae, translated by L. L. Gunderson (Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1980).

Frederick II. De arte venandi cum avibus: https://www.hsaugsburg.de/~harsch/Chronologia/Lspost13/FridericusII/fri_arsp.html.

Robert Grosseteste, De cometis, edited by L. Baur, Die philosophischen Werke des Robert Grosseteste, Bischofs von Lincoln (Munster: Aschendorf, 1912).

Robert Grosseteste, Commentarius in Posteriorum Analyticorum Libro, edited by P. Rossi (Florence: Olschki, 1981).

Isidore of Seville, Etymologiarum, edited by W. Lindsay, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).

Leo, Historia de preliis, edited by F. Pfister (Heidelberg: Sammlung Mittellateinischer Texte, 1913).

Peter Perigrinus of Maricourt, Epistola de magnete, edited by L. Sturlese and R. Thomson, Petrus Peregrinus de Maricourt, Opera (Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore, 1995); in English, The Letter of Petrus Peregrinus on the Magnet, c. 1269, translated by Fr. Arnold (New York: McGraw, 1904).

Thomas of Kent, The Anglo-Norman Alexander (Le Roman de Toute Chevalerie), edited by B. Foster with I. Short, 2 vols. (London: Anglo-Norman Text Society, 1976).

Thomas of Kent, Le Roman d’Alexandre ou Le Roman de Toute Chevalerie, translated by C. Gaullier-Bougassas and L. Harf-Lancner (Paris: H. Champion, 2003).

William of Auvergne, De universo, edited by P. Aubouin, Opera omnia, 2 vols. (Paris: C. Barbin, 1674).

Secondary Sources

Alessio, Franco, Mito e scienza in Ruggero Bacone (Milan: Ceschina, 1957).

Allen, Meagan S., Roger Bacon’s Medical Alchemy: Medieval Pharmacology and the Prolongio Vitae. Ph.D. dissertation (Indiana University, June 2021).

Allen, Meagan S., “Roger Bacon’s Medical Alchemy and the Multiplication of Species”, in The Philosophy and Science of Roger Bacon, edited by N. Polloni and Y. Kedar (London: Routledge, 2021), 159-174.

Allsen, Thomas T., The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).

Carton, Raoul, L’Experience Physique chez Roger Bacon (Paris : J. Vrin, 1924).

Cooper, Lisa H., Artisans and Narrative Craft in Late Medieval England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).

Crombie, Alastair C., Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science, 1100-1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953).

Druart, Thérèse-Anne, “Al-Kindi’s Ethics”, Review of Metaphysics 47 (1993): 329-357.

Glossarum mediae et infimae latinitatis, edited by C. DuCange, 10 vols. (Paris: Librarie des Sciences et des Arts, 1937-38).

La fascination pour Alexandre le Grand dans les littératures européenes (Xème-XVIème siècle), edited by C. Gaullier-Bougassas, 4 vols. (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004).

Gaullier-Bougassas, Catherine, “Savoir scientifique et ‘roman historique’ l’Alexandre anglo-normand de Thomas de Kent”, in Savoirs et fiction au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance, edited by D. Boutet and J. Ducos (Paris: H. Champion, 2015), 143-159.

Getz, Faye, “Roger Bacon and Medicine: The Paradox of the Forbidden Fruit and the Secrets of Long Life”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 337-364.

Grignaschi, Mario, “L’origine et les metamorphoses du Sirr al-’asrar”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 43 (1976): 9-112.

Grignaschi, Mario, “Remarques sur la formation et l’interprétation du Sirr al-‘asrar”, in Pseudo-Aristotle, The Secret of Secrets: Sources and Influences, edited by W. F. Ryan and C. B. Schmitt (London: Warburg Institute, 1982), 3-33.

Hackett, Jeremiah, “Roger Bacon: His Life, Career, and Works”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997).

Hackett, Jeremiah, “Roger Bacon on Scientia Experimentalis”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 277-316.

Hackett, Jeremiah, “Ego Expertus Sum”, in Expertus sum. L’expérience par les sens dans la philosophie naturelle médiévale. Actes du colloque international de Pont-à-Mousson, 5-7 février 2009, edited by T. Bénatouïl and I. Draelants (Florence: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galluzo, 2011), 145-174.

Hackett, Jeremiah, “Roger Bacon’s Concept of Experience: A New Beginning in Medieval Philosophy?”, The Modern Schoolman 86 (November 2008/January 2009): 123-146.

Hackett, Jeremiah, “Scientia experimentalis: from Robert Grosseteste to Roger Bacon”, in Robert Grosseteste: New Perspectives on His Thought and Scholarship, edited by J. McEvoy (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995), 89-119.

Halleux, Robert J., “Entre philosophie naturelle et savoir d’ingénieur: L’Epistola de magnete de Pierre de Maricourt”, Archives internationals d’histoire des sciences 50 (2006): 3-17.

Harkness, Deborah, The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008).

Ingham, Patricia Clare, The Medieval New (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).

Jackson, Peter, The Mongols and the West, 1221-1410, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2018).

Kamp, Norbert, Enciclopedia dei Papi, 3 vols. (Rome: Instituto della Encyclopedia Italiana, 2000).

Kedar, Yael, “The Intellect Naturalized: Roger Bacon on the Existence of Corporeal Species within the Intellect”, Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 131-157.

Kheirandish, Elaheh, “Footprints of ‘Experiment’ in Early Arabic Optics”, Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 79-104.

Kleinert, Andreas, “Le moteur magnéto-mécanique de Pierre de Maricourt. Comptes-rendus du séminaire: Origine des idées scientifiques, ruptures et continuités”, Centre Commun d’Histoire des Sciences et d’Epistémologie de Lille 1 (2005): 22-34.

Lemay, Richard, “Roger Bacon’s Attitude Toward the Latin Translations and Translators of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 25-48.

Lindberg, David, “Roger Bacon’s Theory of the Rainbow: Progress or Regress?”, Isis 57 (1966): 236-249.

Lindberg, David, “Lines of Influence in thirteenth-Century Optics: Bacon, Witelo, and Pecham”, Speculum 46 (1971): 66-83.

Lindberg, David, Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976).

Lindberg, David, “The Western Reception of Arabic Optics”, in The Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science, edited by R. Rashed, 3 vols. (London: Routledge, 1996), II, 716-729.

Lindberg, David, “Roger Bacon on Light, Vision and the Universal Emanation of Force”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 243-275.

Lindberg, David, The Beginnings of Western Science, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).

Roger Bacon: Essays Contributed by Various Writers on the Occasion of the Commemoration of the Seventh Centenary of his Birth, edited by A. G. Little (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914).

Little, A. G., “Roger Bacon’s Works with References to the MSS and Printed Editions”, in Roger Bacon: Essays Contributed by Various Writers on the Occasion of the Commemoration of the Seventh Centenary of his Birth, edited by A. G. Little (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914), 375-425.

Long, Pamela O., Openness, Secrecy, and Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).

Long, Pamela O., Artisan-Practitioners and the Rise of the New Sciences, 1400-1600 (Corvallis, Ore.: Oregon State University Press, 2011).

Marcacci, Flavia, “Roger Bacon’s Mathematics: Demonstrative System and Metaphysics in the Communia mathematica”, Franciscan Studies 75 (2017): 407-421.

Matus, Zachary, “Reconsidering Roger Bacon’s Apocalypticism in Light of His Alchemical and Scientific Thought”, Harvard Theological Review 105 (2012): 189-222.

Matus, Zachary, Franciscans and the Elixir of Life: Religion and Science in the Later Middle Ages (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017).

Manzaloui, Mahmoud, “The Pseudo-Aristotelian Kitab Sirr al-asrar: Facts and Problems”, Oriens 23-24 (1974): 147-257.

McVaugh, Michael, “Determining a Drug’s Properties: Medieval Experimental Protocols”, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 91 (2017): 183-209.

Molland, A. George, “Roger Bacon’s Knowledge of Mathematics”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 151-174.

Mora-Lebrun, Francine, “Mettre en romanz”: Les romans d’antiquité du XIIème siècle et leur postérité (XIIIème-XIVème siècles) (Paris: H. Champion, 2008).

Nagel, Silvia, “Pietro Peregrino: il sapiens-simplex eccelente di Ruggero Bacone”, in Francescani e le scienze (Spoleto: Centro Italiano Di Studi Sull’Alto Medioevo, 2012), 19-47.

Newman, William, “An Overview of Roger Bacon’s Alchemy”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 317-336.

Newman, William, Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).

Ovitt, George Jr., The Restoration of Perfection: Labor and Technology in Medieval Culture (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987).

Panti, Cecilia, “The Theological Use of Science in Robert Grosseteste and Adam Marsh According to Roger Bacon: The Case Study of the Rainbow”, in Robert Grosseteste and the Pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages, edited by J. Cunningham and M. Hocknull (Switzerland: Springer, 2016), 143-163.

Panti, Cecilia, Moi, virtù e motori celesti nella cosmologia di Roberto Grossatesta. Studio ed edizione dei trattati “De sphera”, “De cometis”, “De motu supercelestium” (Florence: SISMEL, 2001)

Paravincini Bagliani, Agostino, “Ruggero Bacone, Boniface VIII, e la theoria della prolongatio vitae”, in Medicina e scienza della natura, alla corte dei papi nel Ducento, edited by A. Paravincini Bagliani (Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 1991), 281-326.

Power, Amanda, “Franciscan Advice to the Papacy in the Middle Ages”, History Compass 5 (2007): 1550-1575.

Power, Amanda, “Going among the Infidels: The Medicant Orders and Louis IX’s First Mediterranean Campaign”, Mediterranean Historical Review 25 (2010): 187-202.

Power, Amanda, Roger Bacon and the Defence of Christendom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).

Rivera, J. Luis, “Pierre de Maricourt”, in A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by J. E. Garcia and T. B. Noone (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003), 538-539.

Sabra, Abdelhamid I., The Optics of Ibn al-Haytham: Books I-III On Direct Vision, 2 vols. (London: The Warburg Institute, 1989).

Sabra, Abdelhamid I., “Ibn al-Haytham’s Revolutionary Project in Optics: The Achievement and the Obstacle”, in The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, edited by J. P. Hogendijk and A. I. Sabra (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003), 85-118.

Sannino, Antonella, “Guillaume d’Auvergne e i libri experimentorum”, in Expertus sum. L’expérience par les sens dans la philosophie naturelle médiévale. Actes du colloque international de Pont-à-Mousson, 5-7 février 2009, edited by T. Bénatouïl and I. Draelants (Florence: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galluzo, 2011), 67-88.

Singer, Dorothea W., “Alchemical Writings Attributed to Roger Bacon”, Speculum 7 (1932): 80-86.

Smith, Julian A., “Precursors to Peregrinus: The Early History of Magnetism and the Mariner’s Compass in Europe”, Journal of Medieval History 18 (1992): 21-74.

Smith, Mark A., “Alhacen's Theory of Visual Perception: A Critical Edition, with English Translation and Commentary, of the First Three Books of Alhacen's ‘De aspectibus’, the Medieval Latin Version of Ibn al-Haytham’s ‘Kitāb al-Manāẓir’: Volume One”, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 91/4 (2001): i-337.

Smith, Pamela, The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

Sparavigna, Amelia Carolina, “Peter Peregrinus of Maricourt and the Medieval Magnetism”, Mechanics, Materials Science, and Engineering 12 (2016): 1-8.

Stock, Brian, “The Self and Literary Experience in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages”, New Literary History 25 (1994): 839-852.

Tachau, Katherine, Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250-1345 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1988).

Thorndike, Lynn, Jr., “Roger Bacon and the Experimental Method in the Middle Ages”, Philosophical Review 23 (1914): 271-298.

Truitt, E. R., “‘Trei poëte, sages dotors, qui mout sorent di nigromance’: Knowledge and Automata in Twelfth-Century French Literature”, Configurations 12 (2005): 167-193.

Truitt, E. R., “The Virtues of Balm in Late Medieval Literature”, Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 711-736.

Van Dyke, Christina, “The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth: Robert Grosseteste on Universals (and the Posterior Analytics)”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2010): 158-170.

Vescovini, Graziella Federici, “La Fortune de l’Optique d’Ibn Al-Haitham: Le livre De aspectibus (Kitab al-manazir) dans le moyen âge Latin”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences 40 (1990): 220-238.

Wiedemann, Eilhard, “Zu Ibn al Haitams Optik”, Archiv für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Tecknik 3 (1910-11): 1-53.

Wiedemann, Eilhard, “Arabische Studien über den Regenbogen”, Archiv für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Tecknik 4 (1912-13): 453-460.

Whitney, Elspeth, “The Artes Mechanicae, craftsmanship and moral value of technology”, in Design and Production in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, edited by N. van Deusen (Ottawa: Institute of Medieval Music, 1998), 75-87.

Williams, Steven J., “The Early Circulation of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Secret of Secrets in the West: The Papal and Imperial Courts”, Micrologus 2 (1994): 127-144.

Williams, Steven J., “Roger Bacon and His Edition of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Secretum secretorum”, Speculum 69 (1994): 57-73.

Williams, Steven J., “Roger Bacon in Context: Empiricism in the High Middle Ages”, in Expertus sum. L’expérience par les sens dans la philosophie naturelle médiévale. Actes du colloque international de Pont-à-Mousson, 5-7 février 2009, edited by T. Bénatouïl and I. Draelants (Florence: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galluzo, 2011), 123-144.

Williams, Steven J., “Roger Bacon and the Secret of Secrets”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 365-394.

Williams, Steven J., “Two Independent Textual Traditions? The Pseudo-Aristotelian Secret of Secrets and the Alexander Legend”, in Trajectoires européenes du Secretum secretorum du Pseudo-Aristote (XIIIe-XVIe siècle), edited by C. Gaullier-Bougassas, M. Bridges, and J.-Y. Tilliette (Turnhout: Brepols, 2015): 27-54.