O caráter fundacional dos princípios na Figura A da 'Ars generalis ultima' de Raimundo Lúlio

Contenido principal del artículo

Guilherme Wyllie

Resumen

Lúlio descreve a realidade como uma estrutura reticuladamente estratificada. Para tanto, ele se vale da noção metafísica de fundação e a ela confere duas funções absolutamente básicas. Em primeiro lugar, cabe à fundação assegurar a distinção entre os princípios enumerados na figura A da Ars generalis ultima, seus correlativos e Deus, que, apesar de serem necessariamente coextensionais, não se confundem hiperintensionamente por não compartilharem a mesma fundação. Paralelamente, compete à fundação assegurar que os constituintes da realidade possam se arranjar hierarquicamente segundo a variação dos seus graus de semelhança, encadeando-se fundacionalmente conforme a intensidade com a qual os princípios neles se contraem. De fato, a responsável direta por tal organização hierárquica da realidade é justamente essa capacidade de contração que os princípios têm de assumir uma condição contraída nas coisas que os manifestam e que a eles confere o seu caráter fundacional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Sección
ARTÍCULOS

Bibliografía

Fontes primárias

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de consolatione eremitae, edited by J. Stöhr, ROL I (Turnhout: Brepols, 1959), 107-120.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de minori loco ad maiorem, edited by J. Stöhr, ROL I (Turnhout: Brepols, 1959), 267-275.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de essentia et esse Dei, edited J. Stöhr, ROL I (Turnhout: Brepols, 1959), 361-375.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de perseitate Dei, edited J. Stöhr, ROL II (Turnhout: Brepols, 1959), 151-160.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de praedicatione, edited by A. Soria Flores, ROL III-IV (Turnhout: Brepols, 1961-3).

Raimundo Lúlio, Metaphysica noua et compendiosa, edited by H. Riedlinger, ROL VI (Turnhout: Brepols, 1978), 1-51.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber correlatiuorum innatorum, edited by H. Riedlinger, ROL VI (Turnhout: Brepols, 1978), 117-152.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de forma Dei, edited by H. Harada, ROL VIII (Turnhout: Brepols, 1980), 43-101.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de demonstratione per aequiparantiam, edited by A. Madre, ROL IX (Turnhout: Brepols, 1981), 215-231.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de nouis fallaciis, edited by C. Lohr), ROL XI (Turnhout: Brepols, 1983), 1-136.

Raimundo Lúlio, Ars generalis ultima, edited by A. Madre, ROL XIV (Turnhout: Brepols, 1986).

Raimundo Lúlio, Lectura Artis, quae intitulatas est Brevis practica Tabulae Generali, edited by J. Gayà, ROL XX (Turnhout: Brepols, 1995), 341-438.

Raimundo Lúlio, Logica noua, edited by W. Euler, ROL XXIII (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998), 1-179.

Raimundo Lúlio, Arbor scientiae, edited by P. Villalba Varneda, ROL XXIV-XXVI (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000).

Raimundo Lúlio, Ars demonstrativa, edited by J. E. Rubio, ROL XXXII (Turnhout: Brepols, 2007).

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber de minori loco ad maiorem, edited by J. Stöhr, ROL I (Turnhout: Brepols, 1959), 267-275.

Raimundo Lúlio, Arbor philosophiae, edited by U. Roth, ROL XXXIV (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011), 35-149.

Raimundo Lúlio, Ars inuentiua ueritatis, edited by J. Uscatescu Barrón, ROL XXXVII (Turnhout: Brepols, 2014).

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber mirandarum demonstrationum, edited by I. Salzinger, MOG II (Mainz: Häffner, 1722), 177-420.

Raimundo Lúlio, Lectura super figuras Artis demonstrativae, edited by I. Salzinger, MOG III (Mainz: Häffner,1722), 205-247.

Raimundo Lúlio, Compendium seu commentum Artis demonstrativae, edited by I. Salzinger MOG III (Mainz: Häffner, 1722), 293-452.

Raimundo Lúlio, Quaestiones per Artem demonstratiuam seu inuentivam solubiles, edited by F. Ph. Wolff, MOG IV (Mainz: Häffner, 1729), 17-224.

Raimundo Lúlio, Liber prouerbiorum, edited by F. Ph. Wolff, MOG VI (Mainz: Häffner, 1737), 283-413.

Raimundo Lúlio, Ars breuis, edited by A. Fidora (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1999).

Raimundo Lúlio, Ars breuis, edited by L. Zetzner (Strasbourg: 1651).

Raimundo Lúlio, Llibre des meravelles, edited by Anthony Bonner (Barcelona: Barcino, 2017).

Fontes secundárias

Audi, Paul, “A clarification and defense of the notion of grounding” em Metaphysical Grounding. Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia and B. Schnieder (Cambridge: CUP, 2012), 101-121.

Bealer, George, “Intensional entities”, em Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Craig (London: Routledge, 1998), vol 4, 803-807.

Bergmann, Michael e Jeffrey E. Brower, “A Theistic Argument against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine Simplicity)”, Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2 (2006): 357-386.

Bonner, Anthony “Més sobre el mot i el concepte de ‘dignitas’ em Ramon Llull”, Estudis de llengua i literatura catalanes 32 (1996): 5-14.

Bonner, Anthony, Art and Logic of Ramon Llull (Leiden: Brill, 2007).

Brower, Jeffrey E., “Making Sense of Divine Simplicity”, Faith and Philosophy 25 (2008): 3-30.

Cameron, Ross P., “Do We Need Grounding?” Inquiry 59/4 (2016): 382-397.

Catana, Leo, The Concept of Contraction in Bruno's Philosophy (London: University College London, 2002, PhD Thesis).

Compagno, Carla, “The Liber chaos and Ramon Llull’s Doctrine from Creation to Generation of Material Substance in Sublunar World”, Comprendre 21/2 (2019): 25-55.

Dasgupta, Shamik, “Constitutive explanation”, Philosophical Issues 27 (2017): 74-97.

De Haan, Daniel, “Thomist Classical Theism: Divine Simplicity Within Aquinas’ Triplex Via Theology”, em Classical Theism, edited by J. Fuqua and R. C. Koons (New York: Routledge, 2023), 101-122.

Fine, Kit, “Guide to Ground”, em Metaphysical Grounding. Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia and B. Schnieder (Cambridge: CUP, 2012), 37-80.

Galvan, Sergio e Alessandro Giordani, “A Classical Logic of Existence and Essence”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 29 (2020): 541-570.

Garay, Leopoldo E., “Las dignidades lulianas”, Estudios Lulianos 18 (1974): 25-46.

Gayà, Jordi, “La cosmologia en el “Ars” de Ramon Llull”, em Cosmogonie e cosmologie nel medievo, edited by C. Martello, C. Militello and A. Vella (Louvain La Neuve: FIDEM, 2008), 141-168.

Hopkins, Jasper, Nicholas of Cusa’s Metaphysics of Contraction (Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press, 1983).

Inman, Ross D., “Grounding and Creaturely Participation in God”, em Neo-Aristotelian and The Theology of Nature, edited by W. Simpson, W. Koons and R. Orr (New York: Routledge, 2022), 293-321.

Lewis, David, On the Plurality of Worlds (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1986).

Litland, Jon E., “Grounding, Explanation, and the Limit of Internality”, Philosophical Review 124/4 (2015): 481-532.

Lohr, Charles, “Les fondements de la logique nouvelle de Raymond Lulle”, em Raymond Lulle et le Pays d’Oc, Cahiers de Fanjeaux 22 (Toulouse: Privat, 1987), 233-248.

Maurin, Anna-Sofia, “Grounding and Metaphysical Explanation: It’s Complicated”, Philosophical Studies 176 (2019): 1573-1594.

Mayer, Annemarie C., “Llull and the Divine Attributes in 13th Century Context”, Anuário Filosófico 49/1 (2016): 139-154.

Merle, Hélène, “Dignitas: signification philosophique et theologique de ce term chez Lulle et de ses predecesseurs medievaux”, Estudios Lulianos 21 (1977): 173-193.

Nolan, Daniel, “Hyperintensional Metaphysics”, Philosophical Studies 171/1 (2014): 149-160.

Plantinga, Alvin, Does God Have a Nature? (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980).

Pruss, Alexander, “On Two Problems of Divine Simplicity”, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 1 (2008): 150-167.

Raven, Michael J., “Ground”, Philosophy Compass 10/5 (2015): 322-333.

Raven, Michael J., “Introduction”, em The Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, edited by M. J. Raven (New York: Routledge, 2020), 1-14.

Ruiz Simon, Jopep Maria, “De la naturalesa com mescla a l’art de mesclar (sobre la fonamentació cosmològica de les arts lulianes)”, Randa 19 (1986): 69-99.

Schaffer, Jonathan, “On What Grounds What”, em Metametaphysics. New essays on the foundations of ontology, edited by D. Chalmers, D. Manley and R. Wasserman (Oxford: OUP, 2009), 347-383.

Williamson, Timothy, “Indicative Versus Subjunctive Conditionals, Congruential Versus Non-Hyperintensional Contexts”, Philosophical Issues 16/1 (2006): 310-333.