El alma voladora de Ockham: un argumento contra Enrique de Gante sobre los poderes del alma

Contenido principal del artículo

Nena Bobovnik

Resumen

Los pensadores medievales estuvieron unánimemente de acuerdo en que el alma humana tiene diversas facultades. Sin embargo, este punto es casi el único en el que estuvieron de acuerdo. En el artículo, me centro en dos opiniones contrarias mantenidas por Enrique de Gante y Guillermo de Ockham. Mientras que Enrique de Gante sostenía que las facultades del alma se definen con respecto a las actividades para las que son facultades, Ockham refutó tal afirmación. Para respaldar su punto, Ockham lanza un experimento mental: si Dios creara un alma intelectual sin crear nada más, ¿no existirían plenamente las facultades en esta alma? Tras presentar sucintamente la visión de Enrique de Gante sobre las facultades del alma, proporciono un análisis detallado de la contraargumentación de Ockham. Argumento que Enrique aún podría responder a la refutación de Ockham, y muestro cómo este último guarda un parecido remoto con el argumento del hombre volador de Avicena.


 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Sección
ARTÍCULOS

Bibliografía

Primary sources

Henry of Ghent, Quodlibeta, edited by J. Badius (Louvain: Bibliothèque S. J., 1961 reprint).

Henry of Ghent, Summa art. XXXV-XL, edited by G. A. Wilson (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1994).

Henry of Ghent, Quodlibet 3.14, translated by JT Paasch (Available online on: https://www.academia.edu/6040790/Henry_of_Ghent_Quodlibet_3_14_Latin_English Text and_Translation).

John Duns Scotus, Quaestiones super Libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis, edited by R. Andrews et al. (St. Bonaventure N.Y.: The Franciscan Institute Press, 1997).

John Duns Scotus, A Treatise on Potency and Act: Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Book IX, translated by A. B. Wolter (St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: The Franciscan InstitutePress, 2000).

Peter John of Olivi, Summa II = Quaestiones in secundum librum sententiarum 3 vols, edited by B. Jansen (Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi 4-6) (Florence: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1922-1926).

William of Ockham, Questiones in librum secundum Sententiarum = Reportatio. Opere Theologicae V, edited by G. Gál and R. Wood (St. Bonaventure N.Y.: St Bonaventure University, 1981).

William of Ockham, Quodlibetal Questions, translated by A. J. Freddoso and F. E. Kelley (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1991).

William of Ockham, Questions on Virtue, Goodness, and the Will, translated by Eric W. Hagedorn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).

Secondary sources

Adams, Marilyn McCord, William Ockham, vol 1 (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987).

Aquila, Richard E., “Emotions, Objects and Causal Relations”, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 26/3-4 (1974): 279-285.

van den Bercken, J. H. L., “John Duns Scotus in Two Minds About the Powers of the Soul”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 82/2 (2015): 199-240.

Brower-Toland, Susan, “Intuition, Externalism, and Direct Reference in Ockham”, History of Philosophy Quarterly 24/4 (2007): 317-335.

Celestino, Piana, “La controversia della distinzione fra anima e potenze ai primordi della Scuola Scotista”, in Miscellanea del Centro di studi medievali (Milano: Società Editrice Vita e pensiero, 1956), 65-169.

Choi, Philip, “Ockham’s weak externalism”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24/6 (2016): 1075-1096.

Cross, Richard, “Accidents, Substantial Forms, and Causal Powers in the Late Thirteenth Century: Some Reflections on the Axiom actiones sunt supositorum”, in Compléments de substance: Études sur les propriétés accidentelles offertes à Alain de Libera, edited by C. Erismann and A. Schniewind (Paris: Vrin, 2008), 133-146.

Decorte, Jos, “Relatio as Modus Essendi: The Origins of Henry of Ghent’s Definition of Relation”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10/3 (2002): 309-336.

Gilson, Étienne, “Les sources gre´co-arabes de l’augustinisme avicennisant”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litte´raire du moyen âge 4 (1929): 40-42.

Hasse, Dag Nikolaus, Avicenna’s De anima in the Latin West: The Formation of a Peripatetic Philosophy of the Soul, 1160–1300 (London: The Warburg Institute, 2000).

Henninger, Mark G. S. J., Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).

Kenny, Anthony, Action, Emotion, and Will (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963).

Löwe, Can Laurens, and Dominik Perler, “Complexity and Unity: Peter of John Olivi and Henry of Ghent on the Composition of the Soul”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 89/2 (2022): 335-386.

Macken, Raymond, “Les diverses applications de la distinction intentionnelle chez Henri de Gand”, in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 13.2), edited by W. Kluxen (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 1981), 769-776.

Paasch, J.T. (tr.), Henry of Ghent, Quodlibet 3.14 (Available at: https://www.academia.edu/6040790/Henry_of_Ghent_Quodlibet_3_14_Latin_EnglishTextand_Translation).

Paasch, J. T., “Powers”, in The Routledge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, edited by R. Cross and J.T. Paasch (New York: Routledge, 2021), 111-114.

Paasch, J. T., Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Pasnau, Robert, Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

Polloni, Nicola, The Twelfth-Century Renewal of Latin Metaphysics: Gundissalinus’s Ontology of Matter and Form (Turnhout: Brepols, 2020).

Schierbaum, Sonja, “Ockham on Awareness of One’s Acts: A Way Out of the Circle”, Society and Politics 12/2 (2018): 8-27.

Shargel, Daniel, “Emotions Without Objects”, Biology and Philosophy 30 (2015): 831-844.

Spruit, Leen, ’Species Intelligibilis’: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. 1 (Brill: Leiden; New York; Köln, 2004).

Teroni, Fabrice, “Emotions and Formal Objects”, Dialectica 61/3 (2007): 395-415.

Toivanen, Juhana, “The Fate of the Flying Man: Medieval Reception of Avicenna’s Thought Experiment”, Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3 (2015): 64-98.

Williams, Scot M, “Henry of Ghent on Real Relations and the Trinity: The Case for Numerical Sameness Without Identity”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 79/1 (2012): 109-148.

Wilson, J. R. S, Emotion and Object (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972).

Wood, Adam, “The Faculties of the Soul and Some Medieval Mind-Body Problems”, The Thomist, 75/4 (2011): 585-636.