The 'Pseudopythagorica' and their Philosophical Background. A discussion of Angela Ulacco, 'Pseudopythagorica Dorica'

Main Article Content

Riccardo Chiaradonna
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-2415

Abstract

This is a review article of Angela Ulacco’s recent Italian translation, with introduction and commentary, of four pseudo-Pythagorean treatises. Part 1 focuses on the philosophical background of the Pseudopythagorica and, more precisely, on the connection between these treatises and first century BC philosophy. Part 2 focuses on Pseudo-Archytas’s On opposites and discusses some parallels between this work and the early Peripatetic commentators (in particular Boethus of Sidon). Parts 3 and 4 focus on Pseudo-Archytas’s On principles. This treatise contains echoes of Aristotle’s theology and the same situation can be found in a famous fragment of Eudorus of Alexandria. It is argued that Plutarch’s references to Aristotle’s metaphysics and epoptics (see in particular Plutarch, Alex., 7) can shed some light on these issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chiaradonna, R. (2019). The ’Pseudopythagorica’ and their Philosophical Background. A discussion of Angela Ulacco, ’Pseudopythagorica Dorica’. Mediterranea, International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge, 4, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.21071/mijtk.v4i0.11157
Section
Notes