The 'Pseudopythagorica' and their Philosophical Background. A discussion of Angela Ulacco, 'Pseudopythagorica Dorica'

Contenido principal del artículo

Riccardo Chiaradonna
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-2415

Resumen

This is a review article of Angela Ulacco’s recent Italian translation, with introduction and commentary, of four pseudo-Pythagorean treatises. Part 1 focuses on the philosophical background of the Pseudopythagorica and, more precisely, on the connection between these treatises and first century BC philosophy. Part 2 focuses on Pseudo-Archytas’s On opposites and discusses some parallels between this work and the early Peripatetic commentators (in particular Boethus of Sidon). Parts 3 and 4 focus on Pseudo-Archytas’s On principles. This treatise contains echoes of Aristotle’s theology and the same situation can be found in a famous fragment of Eudorus of Alexandria. It is argued that Plutarch’s references to Aristotle’s metaphysics and epoptics (see in particular Plutarch, Alex., 7) can shed some light on these issues.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Chiaradonna, R. (2019). The ’Pseudopythagorica’ and their Philosophical Background. A discussion of Angela Ulacco, ’Pseudopythagorica Dorica’. Mediterranea, International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge, 4, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.21071/mijtk.v4i0.11157
Sección
Notas