La tripartición de la justicia en los comentarios de Tomás de Vio a Summa theologiae II-II, qq. 57-62
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper compares the Cajetan commentaries to the notion of justice held by Aquinas in S. Th. II-II, qq. 57-62. A synthesis of such definition is offered from the collected notes. Turning to the «tripartition» notion we explain the fundamental differences between the commentaries of Thomas de Vio and Aquinas. As a conclusion, we offer some arguments regarding the applied effects that such a notion implies for the Ethical reflection, as well as the influence it could have had in later philosophical thought.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Publication Facts
Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers
2
2.4
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability
N/A
16%
External funding
N/A
32%
Competing interests
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted
14%
33%
Days to publication
194
145
Indexed in
-
—
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
How to Cite
Lázaro, N. A. (2020). La tripartición de la justicia en los comentarios de Tomás de Vio a Summa theologiae II-II, qq. 57-62. Revista Española De Filosofía Medieval, 27(2), 107–140. https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v27i2.12822
Section
ARTICLES
References
Prof. Dr. Nicolás A. Lázaro
Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Filosofía Patrística y Medieval “Studium”, CONICET‒Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
Universidad Católica de Santa Fe (UCSF)
Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Filosofía Patrística y Medieval “Studium”, CONICET‒Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
Universidad Católica de Santa Fe (UCSF)