On Coercion and Freedom in Classical Islamic Thought
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, after contrasting the views of Kant and Aristotle on responsibility and freedom with respect to coercion, and after brief considerations on the issue of freedom in Islamic thought, we review what the most representative thinkers of the classical Islamic area have said about coercion. These thinkers are, above all, the mutakallimimūn, the “theologians” of Islam, particularly the Mu'tazilites, the group which gave the greatest place for reason in their discussions and standing out among them ‘Abd al-Jabbâr (d. 1025), whose analyses dealt most with this matter. Finally, the opinion of ‘Abd al-Jabbâr is contrasted with those of al-Bâqillânî (d. 1013) and Algazel (d. 1111), whose solution is very close to that of Kant.
A short appendix follows to illustrate the issue raised through the reflections of Semprun and Améry on their experience of coercion – that is, torture – suffered.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- UCOPress
Article Details
Proposed Policy for Journals that Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Since issue 33 and for the future issues, it is the policy of the publisher that authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).