Roger Bacon’s New Metaphysics (1260-1292): The Integration of Language Study and Natural Science With Metaphysics and Morals

Main Article Content

Jeremiah Hackett

Abstract

The paper presents evidence that Roger Bacon was endeavoring to structure what he considered as a “new metaphysics”. Moreover, it identifies the Opus maius as Bacon’s new preliminary text in metaphysics and morals. The evidence is found in the Communia naturalium and in the Communia mathematica, in which one finds a reference to the Opus maius as a sketch for a new metaphysics. From part seven of the latter work, namely, the Moralis philosophia, one can see that Bacon views the latter work as closely connected to his new metaphysics. In fact, the material in the Communia mathematica connects his studies on languages to the communication of his moral vision. I present a review of the sources for the different parts of the Opus maius. This is followed by an account of Bacon’s philosophical sources. It becomes clear that Bacon was acquainted with Plato’s Meno, Phaedo and part of the Timaeus with Calcidius’s Commentary. The variety and significance of his Neo-Platonic sources are outlined. It turns out that Bacon was not an Avicennian substance-dualist. Moreover, the paper demonstrates the extent to which Bacon’s criticism of Averroes was based on his natural philosophy. Bacon presents an account of human intellectual knowledge which is clearly based on and refers to his account of human perceptual knowledge in his Perspectiva. He uses his account of an integrated perceptual and intellectual human individual being to question the Latin Averroist’s claim that there is one possible intellect for all human beings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
ARTICLES

References

Bibliography

Roger Bacon’s Works

CM = Communia mathematica, edited by R. Steele, Opera hactenus inedita, fasc. 16 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940).

CN = Communia naturalium, edited by R. Steele, Opera hactenus inedita, fascs. 2-4 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).

De mult. Spec. = De multiplicatione specierum, edited by D. C. Lindberg, Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).

Opus maius, edited by J. H. Bridges, 3 vols. (Oxford, Vols. 1-2, 1897; Edinburgh, Vol. 3 with corrections, 1900; Frankfurt: Minerva Reprint, 1964).

Opus minus (London: RBMAS, Rolls Series, 15, 1859; Reprint: Nelden, Lichtensstein: Krauss, 1965).

Opus tertium, edited by N. Egel (Philosophische Bibliothek, Band 718) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2019).

Opus tertium, edited by J. R. S. Brewer (London: RBMAS, 1859).

Perspect. = Perspectiva, edited by D.C. Lindberg, Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).

MP = Moralis Philosophia (= Opus maius, part seven), edited by E. Massa (Zurich: Thesaurus Mundi, 1953).

Compendium studii theologia, edited by T. S. Maloney (Leiden-New York-København-Köln: E. J. Brill, 1988).

Other Primary Sources

Al-Farabi, De scientiis, edited by A. Galonnier, Le De scientiis Alfarabii de Gérard de Crémone: Contriution aux problems de l’acculturation au xiie siècle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2016).

Apuleius, De Deo Socratis, edited by C. Moreschini (Berlin, B. G.: Teubner, 1991).

Apuleius, De Platone, edited by J. A. Stover, A New Work of Apuleius: The Lost Third Book of De Platone: De Platonis Pluribus Libris Compendiosa Expositio (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).

Augustine, De civitate dei, edited by M. Dombart and A. Kalb, 2 vols. (Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1981).

Augustine, De musica, edited by M. Jacobsson (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2017).

Avicenna, Philosophia prima = Avicenna Latinus: Liber de prima philosophia sive Scientia Divina, edited by S. Van Riet (Louvain and Leiden: E. Peeters and E. J. Brill, 1980).

Calcidius, On Plato’s Timaeus, edited by J. Magee (Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, 2016).

Plato, Meno, edited by R. Klibansky and L. Minio-Paluello (London: Warburg Institute, 1950).

Plato, Phaedo, edited by V. Kordeuter & L. Labowsky (London: Warburg Institute, 1950).

Ptolemy, Almagest, edited by G. J. Toomer (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).

Ptolemy, Optics, edited and translated by A. Lejune, L’Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d’après l’arabe de l’émir Eugène de Sicile (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1989).

Ptolemy, Optics, translated by A. Mark Smith, Ptolemy’s Theory of Visual Perception: An English Translation of the Optics with Introduction and Commentary (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society Press, 1996).

Secondary Sources

Albertson, David, Mathematical Theologies: Nicholas of Cusa and the Legacy of Theirry of Chartres (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).

Anheim, Étienne, Grévin, Benoit and Morand, Martin, “Éxégè Judeo-Chrétienne, Magie et Linguistique: Un Recueil De ‘Notes’ Inédit Attribuée a Roger Bacon”, Archives Doctrinale Littéraire Du Moyen Âge 66 (2001): 95-154.

Chrisciani, Chiara, “Universal and Particular in the Communia Naturalium: Between and ”, in Roger Bacon’s Communia Naturalium: A 13th Century Philosopher’s Workshop, edited by P. Bernardini and A. Rodolfi (Firenze: SISMEL-Edizioni Del Galluzo, 2014).

Delorme, Ferdinand M., “Le Prologue de Roger Bacon àson traité De Influentiis Agentium”, Antonianum 18 (1943): 81-90.

Dinkova-Brunn, Greti and Panti, Cecilia, “Robert Grosseteste’s De iride and its addendum in the Vatican Manuscript Barb. Latr. 165: Transmission, Reception and Meaning”, in Manuscripts in the Making: Art and Science, edited by S. Panauotova and P. Ricciardi, Vol. II (London and Turnhout: Brepols and Harvey Millar Publishers, 2018), 23-31.

Druart, Thérèse-Anne, “Roger Bacon and His ‘Arabic’ Sources in the Moralis Philosophia”, in Pre-Modern Philosophy in Greek, Hebrew, Arabic and Latin Traditions, edited by L. Farjeat, K. Krause and N. Oschman (Forthcoming).

Galonnier, Alain, Le De scientiis Alfarabi de Gérard de Crémone: Contribution aux problemes de l’acculturation au xiie siècle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2016).

Gilson, Étienne, “Philosophantes”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale littéraire du Moyen Âge 19 (1952): 135-140.

Hackett, Jeremiah, “The Attitude of Roger Bacon to the Scientia of Albertus Magnus”, in Albertus Magnus and the Science: Commemorative Essays 1980, edited by J. A. Weisheipl, O.P. (Toronto: PIMS, 1980), 53-72.

Johnson, Timothy J., “Preaching Precedes Theology: Roger Bacon and the Failure of Mendicant Education”, Franciscan Studies 68 (2010): 83-95.

Johnson, Timothy J., “Roger Bacon’s Critique of Franciscan Preaching”, in Institution and Charisma: Festschrift für Gert Melville, edited by F. J. Felten, A. Kehnel and S. Weinfurt (Köln: Böhlau, 2009), 541-48.

Johnson, Timothy J., “Wisdom has built her house; she has set up seven pillars: Roger Bacon, Franciscan Wisdom, and Conversion to the Sciences”, in The English Franciscan Province (1224-ca. 1350), edited by M. Robson (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2017), 296-315.

Kedar, Yael, Species as Signs: Roger Bacon (1220-94) on Perspectiva and Grammatica, University of Haifa PH.D. Dissertation, 2009.

Kedar, Yael, “The Intellect Naturalized: Roger Bacon and the Existence of Corporeal Species in the Intellect”, Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 131-157.

Lindberg, David C., Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1976).

Linde, Cornelia, How to Correct the Sacra Scriptura: Textual Criticism of the Latin Bible Between the Twelfth and Fifteenth Century (Oxford: The Society for the Study of Medieval Languages and Literature, 2012).

Michaud-Quantin, Pierre and Lemoine, Michel, “Pour Dossier des ‘Philosophantes’”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale littéraire u Moyen Âge 35 (1968): 17-22.

Do Nascimento, Carlos Arthur Ribero, Une Théorie des Opérations naturelles fondée sur L’Optique: Le De multiplicatione specierum de Roger Bacon, Ph. D. Dissertation (Universitéde Montréal, 1975).

Panti, Cecilia, “The Oxford-Paris connection of optics and the Rainbos: Grosseteste’s De Iride, Pseudo-Oresme’s Inter omnes impressions and Bacon’s Perspectiva in BNF, lat. 7434”, in Les Sciences au Moyen Âgee(Xiie-XVe siècle. Autour de Micrologus, edited by D. Jacquart and A. Paravicini-Bagliani (Firenze: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galuzzo, forthcoming).

Panti, Cecilia, “The Theological Use of Science in Robert Grosseteste and Adam Marsh According to Roger Bacon: The Case Study of the Rainbow”, in Robert Grosseteste and the pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages, edited by J. Cunningham and M. Hocknull (Switzerland: Springer: 2016), 143-164.

Phillips, J. R. S., The Medieval Expansion of Europe, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).

Rosier-Catach, Irène, “Roger Bacon on Grammar”, in Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett (Leiden, New York, Köln: E. J. Brill, 1997).

Rosier-Catach, Irène, “Rogeer Bacon, al-Farabi et Augustin. Rhétorique, logique et philosophie morale”, in La Rhétorique D’Aristote. Traditions et Commentaires De L’Antiquite Au Xviie Siècle, edited by G. Dahan and I. Rosier-Catach (Paris: Vrin, 1998), 87-110.

Rutkin, H. Darrell, Sapientia Astrologica: Astrology, Magic and Natural Knowledge, ca. 1250-1800, 1. Medieval Structures (1250-1500): Conceptual, Institutional, Socio-Political, Theologico-Religious and Cultural (Cham: Springer Nature, 2019).

Smith, A. Mark, From Sight to Light: The Passage from Ancient to Modern Optics (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015).

Southern, R. W., Western Views of Islalm in the Middle Ages (Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1962).