The Paradoxes Produced by the Different Ways of Determining the Rapidity of Motion in the Anonymous Treatise De sex inconvenientibus
Main Article Content
Abstract
The anonymous treatise De sex inconvenientibus is a good example of the calculatores’ approach when dealing with motion. It is organized around four main questions relating to the determination of rapidity in four kinds of changes, i.e. in the generation of substantial forms, in alteration, in increase, and in local motion. In some arguments the author points out the paradoxes to which the two ways of determining the rapidity of a motion can lead: rapidity is determined by the effect produced (the degree of quality generated, the space covered, etc.) or it results from the ratio between the moving power and the resistance of the mobile or patient. While this twofold approach to determining rapidity appears in the majority of calculator texts, the two points of view – the analysis according to its effects and the analysis according to its causes – have rarely been confronted.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Primary Sources
Clagett, Marshall, Nicole Oresme and the Medieval Geometry of Qualities and Motions. A Treatise on the Uniformity and Difformity of Intensities known as Tractatus de configurationibus qualitatum et motuum (Madison, Milwaukee and London: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1968).
Crosby, H. Lamar, Thomas of Bradwardine. His Tractatus de Proportionibus. Its Significance for the Development of Mathematical Physics (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1961).
Nicole Oresme, De proportionibus proportionibus and Ad pauca respicientes, edited with Introductions, English Translations and Critical Notes by E. Grant (Madison, Milwaukee and London: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1966).
William Heytesbury, Regule solvendi sophismata (Venice: Bonetus Locatelllus, 1494).
Secondary Sources
Clagett, Marshall, The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages (Madison, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1959).
Di Liscia, Daniel A., “Velocidad quo ad effectus y velocidad quo ad causas: la tradición de los calculadores y la metodología aristotélica”, in Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, edited by D. A. Di Liscia, E. Kessler and Ch. Methuen (Aldershot, Brookfield, Singapore and Sidney: Ashgate, 1997).
Murdoch, John E., “The Science of Motion”, in Science in the Middle Ages, edited by D. C. Lindberg (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978), 206-264.
Papiernik, Joanna, “How to measure different movements? The 14th-century treatise De sex inconvenientibus”, Przegląd Tomistyczny 25 (2019): 445-460.
Rommevaux-Tani, Sabine, “De sex inconvenientibus”. Un traité anonyme de philosophie naturelle au XIVe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 2022).
“The influence of the Oxford Calculatores on the Understanding or Local Motion: The Example of the Tractatus de sex inconvenientibus”, in Quantifying Aristotle. The Impact, Spread and Decline of the Calculatores Tradition, edited by D. A. Di Liscia and E. Sylla (Leiden: Brill, 2022), 153-185.
Sylla, Edith, “Medieval concepts of the latitude of forms. The Oxford calculators”, Archives doctrinales et littéraire du Moyen Age 40 (1973): 223-283.
“The Oxford calculators”, in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Vol. 1: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism 1100–1600, edited by N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg and E. Stump (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
Weijers, Olga, La ‘disputatio’ dans les facultés des arts au moyen âge (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002).
In Search of the Truth. A History or Disputation Techniques from Antiquity to Early Modern Times (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).