Duns Scotus’s Entangled Doctrines of Univocity, Freedom, and the Powers of the Soul
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that that three of Duns Scotus’s most controversial philosophical positions, namely, his doctrine of the univocity of the concept of being, his radical voluntarism, and his formal distinction between the soul and its powers, are related in the following way: The latter two depend upon the former, sometimes in obvious ways that Duns Scotus owns, and sometimes in ways that are not licensed by the doctrine of the univocity of the concept of being as Scotus himself claims to employ it. In particular, I argue that in Scotus’s development of his theory of freedom and his understanding of the powers of the soul, he makes inferences from God to creatures that the doctrine of the univocity of the concept of being does not allow and that, coupled with inferences that are licensed by that doctrine, result in circularity.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
Proposed Policy for Journals that Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Since issue 33 and for the future issues, it is the policy of the publisher that authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Primary Sources
Anselm, De casu diaboli, edited by F.S. Schmitt, S. Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera omnia vol. I (Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1946).
Henry of Ghent, Quodlibeta, edited by J. Badius Ascensius, 2 vols. (Paris, 1518; repr. Louvain, 1961).
John Duns Scotus, Lectura, edited by C. Balić et al., Opera omnia vols. XVI-XXI (Civitas Vaticana: typis Vaticanis, 1950-2013).
John Duns Scotus, Ordinatio, edited by C. Balić et al, Opera omnia vols. I-XIV (Civitas Vaticana: typis Vaticanis, 1950-2013).
John Duns Scotus, Reportatio, edited by L. Wadding, Opera omnia vols. XXII-XXIV (Paris: Louis Vivès, 1891).
John Duns Scotus, Quaestiones super libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis, edited by G. Etzkorn et al., 2 vols., Opera philosophica vols. III-IV (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1997).
John Duns Scotus, Reportatio, edited by A. B. Wolter and O. V. Bychkov, 2. vols., The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture. Reportatio 1-A vol. II, (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 2008).
Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, edited by J. Mortensen and E. Alarcón, 8 vols., Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas vols. XIII-XX (Lander, WY: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012).
Secondary Sources
Adams, Marilyn, “Ockham on Identity and Distinction”, Franciscan Studies 36 (1976): 5-74.
Adams, Marilyn, “Ockham on the Soul: Elusive Proof, Dialectical Persuasions”, Proceedings of the ACPA 75 (2002): 43-77.
Dumont, Stephen, “The Origin of Scotus’s Theory of Synchronic Contingency”, The Modern Schoolman 72 (1995): 149-167.
Dumont, Stephen, “Duns Scotus’s Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction”, Vivarium 43 (2005): 7-62.
Hoffmann, Tobias, Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Noone, Timothy, “Alnwick on the Origin, Nature, and Function of the Formal Distinction”, Franciscan Studies 53 (1993): 231-245.
Paasch, J. Travis, “Powers”, in The Routledge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, edited by R. Cross and J.T. Paasch (New York: Routledge, 2021), 107-125.
Pini, Giorgio, “Univocity in Scotus’ Quaestiones super Metaphysicam: The Solution to a Riddle”, Medioevo 30 (2005): 69-110.
Pickstock, Catherine, “Duns Scotus: His Historical and Contemporary Significance”, Modern Theology 21 (2005): 543-574.
Steele, Jeff and Williams, Thomas, “Complexity Without Composition: Duns Scotus on Divine Simplicity”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2019): 611-631.
Van den Bercken, John, “John Duns Scotus in Two Minds about the Powers of the Soul”, Recherches de theologies et philosophie médiévales 82 (2015): 199-240.
Williams, Thomas, “Duns Scotus”, in A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, edited by T. O’Connor and C. Sandis (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 466-472.
Williams, Thomas, “Radical Orthodoxy, Univocity, and the New Apophaticism”, Unpublished Paper (2006).