Making Meaning in Spanish from Trump’s Meaningless Discourse Shortcomings in Translating the Dark Side of Political Persuasion

Contenu principal de l'article

María Ángeles Orts Llopis
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-9255

Résumé

Donald Trump’s speeches have often been criticised for lacking substance, coherence, and meaningful content, with critics highlighting his use of rhetorical strategies prioritising emotion, spectacle, and polarisation over reasoned debate and thoughtful policymaking. This study addresses the challenge of translating Trump’s heterodox political rhetoric into Spanish, while also examining the limitations of neural and AI-based translation in capturing the nuances and complexities of political persuasion. Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, delivered before the march on the Capitol, is particularly significant due to its potential role in inciting the subsequent events. In it, he repeated false claims of election fraud and urged his supporters to “fight” in an attempt to overturn the election results. Our study aims to identify the unique traits in hisdiscourse, particularly elements of meaningless rhetoric, and how these present challenges for translation. Making sense of his disjointed syntax and abrupt topic shifts is already difficult in English, and these traits add complexity when translating into other languages. We pursue to demonstrate that, despite significant advancements in neural and AI translation systems, they still struggle to capture language nuances, especially in the context of rhetorical quirks and dysphemism used by Trump. His deployment of colloquialisms, tags, hyperbole, and other linguistic oddities, deeply embedded in American culture and political context, are challenging to convey accurately in Spanish without losing their original meaning, subtlety, or impact. Our work seems to find a compromise, enhancing the comprehensibility of the translated version while retaining some of the original’s flavour.


 

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Details de l'article

Rubrique
Articles

Références

Breeze, R., & Llamas Saíz, C. (Coords.). (2020). Metaphor in political conflict: Populism and discourse. Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.

Charaudeau, P. (2002). ¿Para qué sirve analizar el discurso politico? DeSignis: Publicación de la Federación Latinoamericana de Semiótica (FELS), (2), 109-124.

Charaudeau, P. (2003). El discurso de la información. La construcción del espejo social. Gedisa.

Charaudeau, P. (2009). Reflexiones para el análisis del discurso populista (A. M. Gentile, Trad.). Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2), 253-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/dissoc.3.2.3

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Charteris-Black, J. (2017). Analyzing political speeches. Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Palgrave.

Domínguez-García, R., Méndez-Muros, S., Pérez-Curiel, C., & Hinojosa-Becerra, M. (2023). Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public. Profesional de la Información, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137888

Fundéu-RAE. (n.d.). Y es que. In Fundéu. https://www.fundeu.es/recomendacion/y-es-que/

Giroux, H. A. (2023). Trumpism and the challenge of critical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(6), 658-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1884066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1884066

Hall, J. (2021). Donald Trump’s populist foreign policy rhetoric: In search of enemies. London School of Economics. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/105756/1/Hall_in_search_of_enemies_published.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935377

Hart, R. P. (2020). Trump and us: What he says and why people listen. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854979

Inzaurralde, B. (2017, July 7). This linguist studied the way Trump speaks for two years. Here’s what she found. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/07/07/this-linguist-studied-the-way-trump-speaks-for-two-years-heres-what-she-found/

Johnson, T. (2021). Sleepy Joe? Recalling and considering Donald Trump’s strategic use of nicknames. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(3-4), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939572

Kayam, O. (2018). The readability and simplicity of Donald Trump’s language. Political Studies Review, 16(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917706844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917706844

König, H. D. (2023). Performing as a firefighter: Reconstruction of Donald Trump’s speech on the storming of the Capitol through depth hermeneutics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4029

Koschut, S. (2018). The power of (emotion) words: on the importance of emotions for social constructivist discourse analysis in IR. Journal of International Relations and Development, 21, 495-522. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0086-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0086-0

Koschut, S. (2020). The power of emotions in world politics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331220

Lakoff, G. (2016). A minority president: Why the polls failed, and what the majority can do. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-minority-president_b_5834526be4b030997bc136f7

Lakoff, G. (2017). Understanding Trump’s use of language. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/understanding-trumps-use-of-language_b_11144938

Mercieca, J. (2020). Demagogue for president: The rhetorical genius of Donald Trump. Texas A&M University Press.

Merriam-Webster. Steal. In Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/steal

Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001

Moyer, J. M. (2016). Trump’s grammar in speeches ‘just below 6th grade level,’ study finds. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/18/trumps-grammar-in-speeches-just-below-6th-grade-level-study-finds/?utm_term=.08f14770a1e8

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44483088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Muhammad, I. (2021). Donald Trump’s use of dysphemism for mass persuasion. Cairo Studies in English, 2020(1), 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/cse.2021.147190

Partington, A., & Taylor, C. (2018). The language of persuasion in politics: An introduction. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177342

Schertzer, R., & Woods, E. T. (2022). Donald Trump and the new nationalism in America. In R. Schertzer & E. T. Woods (Eds.), The new nationalism in America and beyond: The deep roots of ethnic nationalism in the digital age (pp. 88 112). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547823.003.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547823.003.0005

Sclafani, J. (2018). Talking Donald Trump: A sociolinguistic study of style, metadiscourse, and political identity. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276885

Taylor, D. (2018). Big tech’s double trouble: Bipartisan criticism may signal a reckoning ahead. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/sep/02/big-techs-double-trouble-bipartisan-criticism-may-signal-a-reckoning-ahead

Van Dijk, T. (2002). Political discourse and political cognition. In P. Hilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 203-237). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij

Viser, M. (2015). For presidential hopefuls, simpler language resonates. The Boston Globe. https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2015/10/20/donald-trump-and-ben-carson-speak-grade-school-level-that-today-voters-can-quickly-grasp/LUCBY6uwQAxiLvvXbVTSUN/story.html

Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018). Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? An analysis of stylistic features of Donald Trump’s political discourse during the 2016 election. Discourse & Society, 29(3), 299-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734659

Wodak, R. (2015). Political argumentation. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 43-52). Wiley-Blackwell.

Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664