Nonfiction novel and mockumentary: the (mis)alignment of two discourses anchored reality

Main Article Content

María Paz Cepedello Moreno
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-4394

Abstract

This paper examines the non-fiction novel and the mockumentary as two narrative practices which functioning is determined by formal, semantic and pragmatic criteria. Drawing on the contributions of Shaeffer, Pozuelo Yvancos, Browse, Gibbons and Hatavara, among others, the study argues that both discourses occupy an unstable zone between factuality and fictionality, and that their effectiveness depends on the ways in which they mobilize formal conventions and shape reception. Based on these theoretical premises, Javier Cercas’s Anatomía de un instante and Jordi Évole’s Operación Palace are analyzed as paradigmatic cases of two inverse movements: in the novel, a narrative committed to real events is configured through literary strategies that ultimately impose a kind of pact with the reader other than the one initially expected; in the mockumentary, a fiction adopts documentary forms in order to expose the constructed nature of truth effects. The analysis concludes that both discourses, by virtue of the forms the assume, compel us to rethink narrative truth as an unstable effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
91%
33%
Days to publication 
70
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Ucopress. Cordoba University Press

Article Details

How to Cite
Cepedello Moreno, M. P. (2026). Nonfiction novel and mockumentary: the (mis)alignment of two discourses anchored reality. SERIARTE. Revista científica De Series Televisivas Y Arte Audiovisual, 10, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.21071/seriarte.v10i.19285
Section
Dedicado al Profesor Pedro Poyato

References

AGUILAR ALCALÁ, Sergio (2020), «Del falso documental a lo falso de los documentales: el falso documental como síntoma del documental», adCommunica. Revista Científica de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación, 19, pp. 41-60. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2020.19.4

BARTHES, Roland (1966), «Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits», Communications, 8, pp. 1-27.

BROWSE, Sam, GIBBONS, Alison y HATAVARA, Mari (2019), «Real fictions. Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling», Narrative Inquiry, 29, 2, pp. 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19025.bro

CERCAS, Javier (2001), Soldados de Salamina, Barcelona: Tusquets.

CERCAS, Javier (2009), Anatomía de un instante, Barcelona: Mondadori.

FERNÁNDEZ PRIETO, Celia (2016), «Las paradojas de una novela sin ficción: Anatomía de un instante de Javier Cercas», Studi Ispanici, 41, pp. 67-76.

FLUDERNIK, Monika (2019), «Factual Narration in Narratology», en FLUDERNIK, Monika y RYAN, Marie Laure (eds.), Narrative Factuality: A Handbook, Berlín-Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 51-74.

GARCÍA, Victoria (2021), «Crítica y no ficción. Notas para repensar el género en tiempos de “posverdad”», RECIAL, XII, 20, pp. 195-211. https://doi.org/10.53971/2718.658x.v12.n20.35439

HARSHAW, Benjamín (1997), «Ficcionalidad y campos de referencia», en GARRIDO DOMÍNGUEZ, Antonio (comp.), Teoría de la ficción literaria, Madrid: Arco/Libros, pp. 123-157.

HIGHT, Craig y ROSCOE, Jane (2001), Faking it: Mock-Documentary and the Subversion of Factuality, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

JUHASZ, Alexandra y LERNER, Jesse (eds.) (2006), F is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth’s Undoing, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

MONTAGUT, Marta y ARAÜNA, Núria (2015), «Entre la indignación y la interpretación lúdica: el diálogo intergeneracional ante el falso documental Operación Palace», Historia Actual Online, 38, pp. 131-146.

NICHOLS, Bill (2001), Introduction to Documentary, Boomington: Indiana University Press.

NICHOLS, Bill y BARON, Jaimie (2024), Introduction to Documentary (4ª ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

NÚÑEZ RAMOS, Rafael (2010), El pensamiento narrativo. Aspectos cognitivos del relato, Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.

POZUELO YVANCOS, José María (2010), Figuraciones del yo en la narrativa: Javier Marías y E. Vila-Matas, Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.

POZUELO YVANCOS, José María (2022), «Autofiguraciones: de la ficción al pacto de no ficción», Signa, 31, pp. 673-696. https://doi.org/10.5944/signa.vol31.2022.29418

SCHAEFFER, Jean-Marie (2014), «Fictional vs. Factual Narration», en HÜHN, Peter, MEISTER, Jan Christoph, PIER, John y SCHMID, Wolf (eds.), Handbook of Narratology, Berlín: De Gruyter, pp. 179-196.

SEARLE, John Rogers (1975), «Indirect Speech Acts», en COLE, Peter y MORGAN, Jerry L., Syntax and Semantics. Vol 3, Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-82.

SEARLE, John Rogers (1983), Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.

SERNA, Justo (2012), «Javier Cercas. La moral del pasado», El País (edición de la Comunidad Valenciana), 12 de junio, pp. 1-2.

VILLANUEVA, Darío (1992), Teorías del realismo literario, Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.