Obtaining Biogas from the fermentation of Physalis Peruviana L. processing waste (Aguaymanto)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The industrialization of native and organic agricultural species in Peru has recently increased and diversified rapidly, allowing little-known species of high nutritional value, such as Physalis peruvian L., to become accessible in national and international markets. Consequently, the proper management and utilization of its agro-industrial waste, which is also increasing, is of interest to preserve environmental quality and achieve a circular economy.
This laboratory-level experimental research sought to determine the capacity of solid waste from the industrialization of cape gooseberry to generate biogas, obtain fermentation, and measure the biogas produced, comparing pretreated and pre-inoculated samples with samples without prior treatment. Initial physicochemical analyses were able to identify structural changes in the biomass and its fermentation potential with acetic acid pretreatment at different concentrations compared to sulfuric acid. Statistical analyses evaluated the significance of pretreatment, pre-inoculation, and fermentation. The results concluded that they have the potential to produce biogas, that a 0.2 M acetic acid concentration offers greater advantages over other concentrations and a mineral acid, and that fermentations with a pre-inoculum generate biogas in similar quantities and quality.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Córdoba
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Proposed policy for journals offering open access. Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
a) Authors will retain their copyrights, but guarantee the journal the right to the first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License , which allows third parties to share the work provided that the author and initial publication in this journal is indicated.
b) Authors may subscribe other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the work published (for example: place it in an institutional electronic archive, or publish it in a topical volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is duly noted.
Authors are allowed and even encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can foster valuable exchanges and increase citations of the work published. (See The effect of open access).
References
1. AOAC. (2006). Official Methods of Analysis. Gaithersburg: AOAC International
2. CHUM, H. L., JOHNSON, D. K. y BLACK, S. K. (1990) Organosolv pretreatment for enzymic hydrolysis of poplars. 2. Catalyst effects and the combined severity parameter. Ind Eng Chem Res, 29(1), 156–62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie00098a003.
3. GARCÍA, M. A. y GÓMEZ, J. D. (2016). Evaluación de la producción de biogás a partir de residuos vegetales obtenidos en la central de abastos de Bogotá mediante digestión anaerobia. Recuperado de: https://repository.uamerica.edu.co/items/46778e23-2085-48c8-a7ef-b8fc700c791b
4. HERNÁNDEZ, H. A. (2012). Diseño de un biodigestor instrumentado electrónicamente para la generación de biogás en casa habitación. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/diseno-de-un-biodigestor-instrumentado-electronicamente-para-la-generacion-de-biogas-en-casa-habitacion-1?c=Ezg0Qn&d=false&q=*:*&i=2&v=1&
t=search_0&as=0
5. LEE, D., NAM, H., WON, M., LEE, V.H., TORMUNZIN, D., WANG, S. y YONG, P. (2022). Recent progress in the catalytic thermochemical conversion process of biomass for biofuels. Chemical Engineering Journal, 447 (1), 137501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.137501
6. LI Y. B., PARK S. Y ZHU, J. Y. (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 821–826. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042.
7. NEILSON, R. y THORNTON, R. (1987). Organic Chemistry. Boston: Pearson Education.
8. OROZCO, R. S., HERNANDEZ, P. B., MORALES, G. R., NUNEZ, F. U., VILLAFUERTE, J. O. y LUGO, V. L. (2014). Characterization of lignocellulosic fruit waste as an alternative feedstock for bioethanol production. BioResources,9(1),1873–1885.
9. PÁEZ, J.S. (2017). Análisis de la capacidad de fermentación de los residuos de uchuva para la obtención de biogás. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/entities/publication/25a3ed32-
ba90-48d3-8866-746d075e8208
10. PUENTE, L. A., PINTO, C. A., CASTRO, E. S. Y CORTÉS, M. (2011). Physalis peruviana Linnaeus, the multiple properties of a highly functional fruit: A review. Food Research International, 44(7), 1733-1740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.09.034.
11. SAHA, S., KURADE, M. B., EL-DALATONY M. M., CHATTERJEE, P. K., SUNG, D., y JEON, B. (2016). Improving bioavailability of fruit waste using organic acid: An exploratory study of biomass pretreatment for fermentation. Energy Conversion and Management, 127 (1), 256–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.016
12. SIERRA Y SELVA EXPORTADORA. (2020). Análisis de Mercado Aguaymanto 2015 - 2020. Lima: MINISTERIO DESARROLLO AGRARIO Y RIEGO.
13. SPANGHERO, M., SALEM, A. Z. M. y ROBINSON, P.H. Chemical composition, including secondary metabolites, and rumen fermentability of seeds and pulp of Californian (USA) and Italian grape pomaces. Animal Feed Science Technology.152(1), 243–255. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.04.015
14. YANG, B. y WYMAN, C. E. (2008) Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2,26–40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.49.
15. ZAINUDIN, M. H. M., ZULKARNAIN, A., AZMI, A. S., MUNIANDY, S., S., SAKAI, K., SHIRAI, Y., y HASSAN, M. A. (2022). Enhancement of Agro-Industrial Waste Composting Process via the Microbial Inoculation: A Brief Review. Agronomy, 12(1), 198-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010198