¿Cómo puede influir la alta directividad del profesorado de Educación Física en las experiencias de diversión y aburrimiento del alumnado?
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Basada en la Teoría de la Autodeterminación, una teoría reciente en el contexto educativo introduce un modelo circular integrador y detallado que clasifica el estilo motivacional docente en ocho conductas distintas, según su nivel de directividad y el apoyo o amenaza a las necesidades psicológicas básicas del alumnado. Sin embargo, la evidencia hasta ahora sobre cómo los enfoques de alta directividad (i.e., conductas orientadoras, clarificadoras, demandantes y dominadoras) están relacionados con diversas consecuencias en Educación Física es limitada. Dado que el profesorado de Educación Física puede adoptar diversas conductas de alta directividad para gestionar la clase, el presente estudio examina el impacto diferencial de dos tipos de liderazgo de alta directividad: el estilo estructurado (i.e., orientadoras y clarificadoras) versus el estilo controlador (i.e., demandante y dominador), en las consecuencias afectivas del alumnado (i.e., diversión y aburrimiento). En este estudio transversal participó una muestra de conveniencia de 697 estudiantes (51% chicas; Medad = 14.52; DT = 1.45), con edades comprendidas entre los 12 y los 17 años. Los resultados muestran que las conductas orientadoras y clarificadoras predijeron positiva y significativamente la diversión durante las clases de Educación Física. Por el contrario, el aburrimiento fue predicho negativa y significativamente por las conductas orientadoras, mientras que las conductas dominadoras lo predijeron positiva y significativamente. Los resultados del estudio enfatizan que el profesorado de Educación Física debe desarrollar conductas estructuradas (i.e., orientadoras y clarificadoras) y evitar las conductas controladoras (i.e., demandantes y dominadoras) para promover consecuencias positivas en el alumnado.
Descargas
Datos de publicación
Perfil evaluadores/as N/D
Declaraciones de autoría
- Sociedad académica
- Psychology, Society & Education
- Editorial
- UCOPress. Universidad de Córdoba
Detalles del artículo

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista retiene los derechos de autoría patrimoniales de las contribuciones que sean aceptadas para su publicación. Esto quiere decir que adquiere el uso exclusivo del documento para editarse, difundirse, preservarse, etc. en cualquier soporte y por el tiempo que estipule la legislación local que regule la actuación de la publicación.
Psychology, Society & Education se publica bajo CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Citas
Abós, Á., Burgueño, R., García-González, L., & Sevil-Serrano, J. (2022). Influence of internal and external controlling teaching behaviors on students’ motivational outcomes in Physical Education: Is there a gender difference? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 41(3), 502-512. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0316
Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293
Baena-Extremera, A., Granero-Gallegos, A., Bracho-Amador, C., & Pérez-Quero, F. J. (2012). Spanish version of the Sport Satisfaction Instrument (SSI) adapted to Physical Education. Journal of Psychodidactics, 17(2), 377-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.4037
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Mouratidis, A., Mouratidis, A., Katartzi, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Vlachopoulos, S. (2018). Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences. Learning and Instruction, 53, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.006
Behzadnia, B., Adachi, P. J., Deci, E. L., & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). Associations between students’ perceptions of Physical Education teachers’ interpersonal styles and students’ wellness, knowledge, and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.003
Biddle, S. J. H., Ciaccioni, S., Thomas, G., & Vergeer, I. (2019). Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011
Burgueño, R., Abós, Á., Sevil-Serrano, J., Haerens, L., De Cocker, K., & García-González, L. (2024). A circumplex approach to (de)motivating styles in Physical Education: Situations-in-school–Physical Education questionnaire in Spanish students, pre-service, and in-service teachers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 28(1), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2248098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2248098
Burgueño, R., & Medina-Casaubón, J. (2021). Validity and reliability of the interpersonal behaviors questionnaire in Physical Education with spanish secondary school students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(1), 522-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520948286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520948286
Curran, T., & Standage, M. (2017). Psychological needs and the quality of student engagement in Physical Education: Teachers as key facilitators. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 262-276. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0065
De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., Aelterman, N., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Haerens, L. (2016). The different faces of controlling teaching: Implications of a distinction between externally and internally controlling teaching for students’ motivation in Physical Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(6), 632-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1112777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1112777
Diloy-Peña, S., Abós, Á., Sevil-Serrano, J., García-Cazorla, J., & García-González, L. (2024). Students’ perceptions of Physical Education teachers’ (de)motivating styles via the circumplex approach: Differences by gender, grade level, experiences, intention to be active, and learning. European Physical Education Review, 30(4), 563-583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241229353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241229353
Diloy-Peña, S., García-González, L., Sevil-Serrano, J., Sanz-Remacha, M., & Abós, Á. (2021). Estilo motivacional docente en Educación Física: ¿Cómo afecta a las experiencias del alumnado? Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, 2(144), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2021/2).144.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2021/2).144.06
Escriva-Boulley, G., Guillet-Descas, E., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Doren, N., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., & Haerens, L. (2021). Adopting the situation in school questionnaire to examine Physical Education teachers’ motivating and demotivating styles using a circumplex approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), Article 7342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147342
García-Cazorla, J., Diloy-Peña, S., Mayo-Rota, C., García-González, L., & Abós, Á. (2024). How many Physical Education hours do students desire? It depends on the (de-)motivating teaching style perceived. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, 156, 30-38. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2024/2).156.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2024/2).156.04
García-González, L., Haerens, L., Abós, Á., Sevil-Serrano, J., & Burgueño, R. (2023). Is high teacher directiveness always negative? Associations with students’ motivational outcomes in Physical Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, Article 104216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104216
Leo, F. M., Behzadnia, B., López-Gajardo, M. A., Batista, M., & Pulido, J. J. (2022). What kind of interpersonal need-supportive or need-thwarting teaching style is more associated with positive consequences in Physical Education? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 42(3), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2022-0040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2022-0040
Liu, J., Bartholomew, K., & Chung, P. K. (2017). Perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal styles and well-being and ill-being in Secondary School Physical Education students: The role of need satisfaction and need frustration. School Mental Health, 9(4), 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12310-017-9223-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-017-9223-6
Ramires, V. V., Dos Santos, P. C., Barbosa Filho, V. C., Bandeira, A. S., Marinho Tenório, M. C., de Camargo, E. M., Ravagnani, F. C. P., Sandreschi, P., de Oliveira, V. J. M., Hallal, P. C., & Silva, K. S. (2023). Physical Education for health among school-aged children and adolescents: A scoping review of reviews. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 20(7), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2022-0395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2022-0395
Rodrigues, F., Teixeira, D., Neiva, H. P., Cid, L., & Monteiro, D. (2020). The bright and dark sides of motivation as predictors of enjoyment, intention, and exercise persistence. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 30(4), 787-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13617
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Tilga, H., Vahtra, K., & Koka, A. (2023). The role of teachers (de-) motivational styles on students’ autonomous motivation in Physical Education and leisure time. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 15(4), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.15.4.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.15.4.05
Van Doren, N., Compernolle, S., Bouten, A., Haerens, L., Hesters, L., Sanders, T., Slembrouck, M., & De Cocker, K. (2024). How is observed (de)motivating teaching associated with student motivation and device-based physical activity during Physical Education? European Physical Education Review, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241289911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241289911
Van Doren, N., De Cocker, K., Flamant, N., Compernolle, S., Vanderlinde, R., & Haerens, L. (2023). Observing Physical Education teachers’ need-supportive and need-thwarting styles using a circumplex approach: How does it relate to student outcomes? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2230256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2230256
Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L., & Soenens, B. (2019). Seeking stability in stormy educational times: A need-based perspective on (de)motivating teaching grounded in self-determination theory. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 20, 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320190000020004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320190000020004
Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-determination theory applied to Physical Education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444-1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420
White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Self-determination theory in Physical Education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, Article 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247