Parental control measures to regulate smartphones use by children
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The complexity of the current digital ecosystem calls for the development of parental control mechanisms to guide minors in their use of technology. This study aims to identify the type of parental control measures used by parents to monitor the use that school-age children (6 to 12 years old) make of smartphones. An ex post facto design was prepared after conducting a survey in which 885 people (68.7% mothers) took part. The results showed that 93.7% of the parents surveyed used some type of parental control system to regulate the use of the smartphone. The most frequently strategies were limiting the time when the device could be used and restricting access through passwords. The analysis revealed that parents with higher education used a greater number of control mechanisms. Similarly, the length of time the children were connected was related to the level and intensity of the parental control strategies used. Parents applied a greater number of parental control strategies with pre-adolescent children, in the last years of primary education. Finally, the challenges and opportunities that the use of smartphones can bring to children are discussed, and also the active role that the family should play in digital training and education.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal retains the economic copyright of contributions that are accepted for publication. This means that it acquires the exclusive use of the document to be edited, disseminated, preserved, etc. in any support and for the time stipulated by the local legislation that regulates the performance of the publication.
Psychology, Society & Education is published under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
References
Álvarez, K. A., Pilamunga, D. E., Mora, K. G., y Naranjo, M. K. (2020). Tiempo en pantalla (televisión, computadora, celular, tabletas) en las relaciones interpersonales entre niños de 8 a 12 años. Horizontes. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 4(5), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v4i15.113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v4i15.113
Andrade, B., Guadix, I., Rial, A., y Suárez, F. (2021). Impacto de la tecnología en la adolescencia. Relaciones, riesgos y oportunidades. UNICEF España.
Cánovas, G. (2021). Autorregulación digital. Cómo educar en el uso responsable de la tecnología. SM.
Chang, F. C., Chiu, C. H., Chen, P. H., Chiang, J. T., Miao, N. F., Chuang, H. Y., y Liu, S. (2019). Children’s use of mobile devices, smartphone addiction and parental mediation in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 25-32. https://doi-org.ezbusc.usc.gal/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.048
Charisi, V., Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., Vuorikari, R., Escobar Planas, M., Sánchez Martin, J. I., y Gómez Gutiérrez, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the rights of the child: Towards an integrated agenda for research and policy. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.doi.org/10.2760/012329
Chen, V. H. H., y Chng, G. S. (2016). Active and restrictive parental mediation overtime: Effects on youths’ self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers & Education, 98, Artículo 206e212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.012
Comisión Europea. (2018). Guidelines to respect, protect and fulfil the rights of the child in the digital environment. Recommendation CM/Rec (2018)7 of the Committee of Ministers (2018).Comisión Europea. https://bit.ly/41ybOwX
Comisión Europea. (2021). Resolución adoptada sobre los derechos digitales de los niños. Comisión Europea. https://bit.ly/3HAq8x2
Comisión Europea. (2022). A Digital Decade for children and youth: the new European strategy for a better internet for kids (BIK+). Comisión Europea. https://bit.ly/3p7mrIO
Condeza, R., Herrada-Hidalgo, N., y Barros-Friz, C. (2019). New parental mediation roles: Parents’ perceptions of their children’s relationship with multiple screens. Profesional de la Información. 28(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.02
Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á. y Luján-Mora, S. (2021) Mobile learning technologies for education: Bbenefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), Artículo 4111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111
Dedkova, L., y Smahel, D. (2020). Online parental mediation: Associations of family members’ characteristics to individual engagement in active mediation and monitoring. Journal of Family Issues, 41(8), 1112-1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19888255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19888255
Eoh, Y., Lee, E., y Park, S. (2022). The relationship between children’s school adaptation, academic achievement, happiness, and problematic smartphone usage: A multiple informant moderated mediating model. Applied Research Quality Life, 17, 3579-3593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10080-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10080-w
Gaines, B. R. (2019). From facilitating interactivity to managing hyperconnectivity: 50 years of human-computer studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.007
Geržičáková, M., Dedkova, L., y Mýlek, V. (2023). What do parents know about children’s risky online experiences? The role of parental mediation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, Artículo 107626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107626
Glatz, T., Crowe, E., y Buchanan, C. M. (2018). Internet-specific parental self-efficacy: Developmental differences and links to Internet-specific mediation. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.014
Hansen, A. (2021). Insta-Brain. Cómo nos afecta la dependencia digital en la salud y en la felicidad. RBA.
Jiménez-Morales, M., Montaña, M., y Medina-Bravo, P. (2020). Childhood use of mobile devices: Influence of mothers’ socio-
educational level. Comunicar, 64, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-02
Kalmus, V., Blinka, L., y Olafsson, K. (2015). Does it matter what mama says: Evaluating the role of parental mediation in European adolescents’ excessive Internet use. Children & Society, 29(2), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12020
Kim, D., y Jahng, K. E. (2019). Children’s self-esteem and problematic smartphone use: The moderating effect of family rituals. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(12), 3446-3454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01526-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01526-1
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., y Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
Livingstone, S., y Bloom-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital Futurefuture. How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190874698.001.0001
López-De-Ayala, M. C., Martínez-Pastor, E., y Catalina-García, B. (2019). Nuevas estrategias de mediación parental en el uso de las redes sociales por adolescentes. El Profesional de la Información, 28(5), Artículo e280523. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.23
Männikkö, N., Ruotsalainen, H., Miettunen, J., Marttila-Tornio, K., y Kääriäinen, M. (2020). Parental socioeconomic status, adolescents’ screen time and sports participation through externalizing and internalizing characteristics. Helyon, 6(2), Artículo E03415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03415
Martín-Ramallal, P., y Ruiz-Mondaza, M. (2022). Child protection agents and social networks. The TiKToK dilemma. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 13(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.20776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.20776
Martínez, G., Casado, M., y Garitaonandia, C. (2020). Online parental mediation strategies in family contexts of Spain. Comunicar, 65, 67-76. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-06
Matthes, J., Thomas, M. F., Stevic, A., y Schmuck, D. (2021). Fighting over smartphones? Parents’’ excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children’s use, and conflict. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106618
McMillan, J., y Schumacher, S. (2005). Investigación Educativa. Pearson Addison Wesley.
Muñoz-Carril, P. C., Dans-Alvarez-de-Sotomayor, I., Fuentes-Abeledo, E. J., y Platas-Ferreiro, M. L. (2022). Parents’ perceptions of their children’s smartphone use. Culture and Education, 34(4), 974-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2102295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2102295
Nikken, P., y Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3423-3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4
Padilla, S., Rodríguez, E., Torres, A., Suárez, A., y Rodrigo, M. J. (2015). The influence of the family educational scenario on internet use of primary and secondary school children. Journal for the study Study of education Education and Development, 38(2), 402-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1016749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1016749
Pastor Ruiz, Y., Martín Nieto, R., y Montes Vozmediano, M. (2019). Patrones de uso, control parental y acceso a la información de los adolescentes en la red. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(2), 995-1012. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.64821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.64821
Ramírez-García, A., González-Fernández, N., y Salcines-Talledo, I. (2023). Parental mediation and use of mobile devices –smartphones and tablets– in Spanish families. Journal of Family Issues, 44(3), 825-849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211055126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211055126
Ramos-Soler, I., López-Sánchez, C., y Torrecillas-Lacave, T. (2018). Percepción de riesgo online en jóvenes y su efecto en el comportamiento digital. Comunicar, 56, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.3916/c56-2018-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-07
Rideout, V., y Robb, M. B. (2020). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight, 2020. Common Sense Media.
Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., Van Van Oosten, J. M. F., y Igartua, J. J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
Sánchez-Valle, M., De-Frutos-Torres, B., y Vázquez-Barrio, T. (2017). La influencia de los padres en la adquisición de habilidades críticas en Internet. Comunicar, 53, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-10
Schmuck, D., Stevic, A., Matthes, J., y Karsay, K. (2023). Out of control? How parents’ perceived lack of control over children’s smartphone use affects children’s self-esteem over time. New Media & Society, 25(1), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211011452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211011452
Shin, W., y Li, B. (2017). Parental mediation of children’s digital technology use in Singapore. Journal of Children and Media, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1203807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1203807
Shin, W., y Lwin, M. O. (2016). How does “talking about the Internet with others” affect teenagers’ experience of online risks? The role of active mediation by parents, peers, and school teachers. New Media & Society, 7, 1109-1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815626612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815626612
Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., y Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
Sola, J. M., García Vidal, M., y Ortega Navas, M. (2019). Las implicaciones del uso de dispositivos móviles en el proceso de enseñanza aprendizaje en alumnos de 5º y 6º de primaria. Pixel-bit, 55, 117-131. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i55.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i55.07
Sonck, N., y Dde Haan, J. (2014). Safety by literacy? Rrethinking the role of digital skills in improving online safety. En S. Van der Hof, B. Van den Berg, y B. Schermer (eds.) Minding minors wandering the web: Regulating online child safety (pp. 89-104). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-005-3_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-005-3_5
Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Emery, K., Walrave, M., y Heirman, W. (2017). A factorial validation of parental mediation strategies with regard to internet use. Psychologica Belgica, 57, 93-111. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.372
Talves, K., y Kalmus, V. (2015). Gendered mediation of children’s internet use: A keyhole for looking into changing socialization practices. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1), Artículo 4. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4
Warren, R., y Aloia, L. (2019). Parenting style, parental stress, and mediation of children’s media use. Western Journal of Communication, 83(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1582087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1582087
Yang, X., Jiang, P., y Zhu, L. (2023). Parental problematic smartphone use and children’s executive function: The mediating role of technoference and the moderating role of children’s age. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 63, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.017