Impact of the Homework Implementation Method (MITCA) on student involvement: digital versus paper-based intervention
Main Article Content
Abstract
Homework outcomes depend not only on homework quantity but also on implementation quality. This quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study compared two versions of the MITCA homework method –digital (MITCAdigital) and paper (MITCApaper)– with a control condition in 1,170 students (50.1% girls; Mage = 10.7 years, SD = 0.7) from 5th and 6th grade in 20 schools across Galicia, Spain. Over 12 weeks, participants completed Spanish, Galician, and math homework following the MITCA method conditions. Pretest and posttest measures were collected for cognitive involvement (deep and surface approaches), behavioral involvement (amount of homework, time spent, and time management), and affective-motivational involvement (perceived usefulness, interest, attitude, and anxiety). Compared to the control group, both MITCA conditions showed more favorable behavioral patterns (e.g., task completion and homework time). MITCAdigital was associated with higher perceived usefulness and reduced anxiety, while MITCApaper fostered a more positive attitude toward homework. Regarding cognitive involvement, MITCAdigital was linked to greater use of deep learning approaches. These findings support the relevance of a well-structured homework design. Although both versions promoted student involvement, the digital format stood out for its impact on cognitive and emotional involvement. Combining both formats may optimize students’ overall involvement in homework.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Academic society
- Psychology, Society & Education
- Publisher
- UCOPress. Universidad de Córdoba
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal retains the economic copyright of contributions that are accepted for publication. This means that it acquires the exclusive use of the document to be edited, disseminated, preserved, etc. in any support and for the time stipulated by the local legislation that regulates the performance of the publication.
Psychology, Society & Education is published under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
References
Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2393-2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10201-8
Avcı, S., Özgenel, M., & Avcu, A. (2025). Teacher involvement and self-regulation in homework: impact on secondary school students’ homework behavior. Metacognition and Learning, 20, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09431-3
Balaskas, A., Schueller, S. M., Cox, A. L., & Doherty, G. (2022). Understanding users’ perspectives on mobile apps for anxiety management. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, Article 854263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.854263
Chen, L., Wong, S. L., & How, S. P. (2023). A systematic review of factors influencing student interest in online homework. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, Article 039. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18039
Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Díaz-Freire, F., Vieites, T., Rodríguez, S., González-Suárez, R., & Díaz-Pita, L. (2025). Enhancing self-regulation through a digital homework method: comparing digital MITCA and traditional homework approaches. European Journal of Education, 60(4), Article e70337. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70337
Feiss, C., Hagenauer, G., & Moroni, S. (2023). “I feel enthusiastic, when the homework is done well”: teachers’ emotions related to homework and their antecedents. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1239443. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1239443
Feiss, C., Held, T., Hagenauer, G., & Moroni, S. (2025). The relationship between the quality of homework, the experience of anger during homework and the performance of secondary school students in the subject “German”. Educational Studies, 51, 1211-1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2025.2511905
Fernández-Alonso, R., Álvarez-Díaz, M., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2017). Students’ achievement and homework assignment strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00286
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(25). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F., & Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, Article 110673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
Hui, H. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students’ cognitive and affective domain: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1105806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105806
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3
Magalhães, P., Ferreira, D., Cunha, J., & Rosário, P. (2020). Online vs traditional homework: a systematic review on the benefits to students’ performance. Computers & Education, 152, Article 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103869
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
National Institute of Statistics. (2022). Average income per household. National Institute of Statistics.
Negru, I., & Sava, S. (2023). Homework’s implications for the well-being of primary school pupils - perceptions of children, parents, and teachers. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100996
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: an overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413-454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., González-Pienda, J. A., Rosário, P., Mourão, R., & Valle, A. (2015). Homework and academic achievement across Spanish Compulsory Education. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 726-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817537
Oinas, S., Carpelan, R., Heikonen, L., & Hotulainen, R. (2025). Self-regulation of e-learning and students’ divided experiences: a mixed method study. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2025.v40.i2.1382
Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital distractions from the point of view of higher education students. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076044
Regueiro, B. (2018). Metas académicas, deberes escolares y aprendizaje en estudiantes de secundaria [Doctoral Thesis]. Universidade da Coruña. http://hdl.handle.net/2183/21560
Rodríguez, S., Vieites, T., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., Valle, A., & Núñez, J. C. (2025). Homework amount, time spent, and time management: a latent profile analysis in secondary education. Educación XX1, 28(1), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.39364
Rosário, P., Nuñez, J. C., & González-Pienda, J. (2006). Comprometer-se com o estudar na Universidade: «Cartas do Gervásio ao seu Umbigo». Almedina.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie, Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Sui, C. J., Yen, M. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2024). Investigating effects of perceived technology-enhanced environment on self-regulated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12270-x
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, Y. C. (2016). Development of a mobile learning system based on a collaborative problem-posing strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.867889
Tam, V. C., & Chan, R. M. (2011). Homework involvement and functions: perceptions of Hong Kong Chinese primary school students and parents. Educational Studies, 37(5), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2010.539788
Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction. 17, 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009
Valle, A., Pan, I., Regueiro, B., Suárez, N., Tuero, E., & Nunes, A. R. (2015). Predicting approach to homework in primary school students. Psicothema, 27(4), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.118
Valle, A., Piñeiro, I., Rodríguez, S., et al. (2019). Time spent and time management in homework in elementary school students: a person-centered approach. Psicothema, 31(4), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.191
Valle, A., & Rodríguez, S. (Eds.) (2020). MITCA: Homework Implementation Method. University of A Coruña Publication Service. https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497496360
Vieites, T., Díaz-Freire, F. M., Rodríguez, S., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., & Valle, A. (2023). Effects of a homework implementation method (MITCA) on school engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 1283-1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00743-z
Vieites, T., Gonida, E., Díaz-Freire, F. M., Rodríguez, S., & Valle, A. (2024). Effects of a homework implementation method (MITCA) on self-regulation of learning. Metacognition and Learning, 19(2), 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09376-z
Wang, C., Xu, J., Núñez, J. C., & Rodríguez, S. (2023). Self-regulation of online homework behavior: using latent profile analysis to identify online homework management profiles. Educational Psychology, 43(10), 1160-1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2283389
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). 35 years of research on students’ subjective task values and motivation: a look back and a look forward. In A. J. Elliot, Advances in motivation science (vol. 7, pp. 161-198). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
Wiggins, H., & Van der Hoff, Q. (2021). Using an online homework system for fostering self-directed learning. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(3), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.199
Xu, J., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2018). A study of the validity and reliability of the online homework emotion regulation scale. Measurement, 115, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.050
Xu, J. (2020a). Individual and class-level factors for middle school students’ interest in math homework. Learning and Motivation, 72, Article 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101673
Xu, J. (2020b). Longitudinal effects of homework expectancy, value, effort, and achievement: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, Article 101507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101507
Xu, J. (2025a). Do homework effort and approaches matter? regulation of homework motivation among Chinese students. Education Sciences, 15(6), Article 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060666
Xu, J. (2025b). Online homework time, time management, and procrastination: a person-centered approach. Computers & Education, 234, Article 105341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105341
Zhou, C., Wu, D., Li, Y., Yang, H. H., Man, S., & Chen, M. (2023). The role of student engagement in promoting teachers’ continuous learning of TPACK: based on a stimulus-organism-response framework and an integrative model of behavior prediction. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2207-2227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11237-8