Belief in a just world as a multidimensional construct: empirical validation in the Ukrainian context
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examined the structure of belief in a just world, as measured by the Personal and General Belief in a Just World Questionnaire. The primary objective of the study was to compare the basic two-factor model with three competing models. The sample consisted of 629 Ukrainians aged 18 to 74 years (64.2% female). Statistical analysis included confirmatory factor analysis, assessment of reliability indices, and correlation analysis. The two-factor model showed a good fit to the data, while the single-factor model showed unsatisfactory fit indices, and the model with orthogonal factors showed even lower fit indices. The second-order factor model showed fit indices comparable to the baseline model, allowing belief in a just world for oneself and belief in a just world for all to be considered manifestations of the basic desire for justice. Measurement invariance of the questionnaire was confirmed for two gender and two age groups, and no significant differences were found between these groups. The nomological validity of the Ukrainian-language instrument was confirmed: both measures of belief in a just world were positively associated with life satisfaction and negatively with belief in a dangerous world, with these associations being stronger for belief in personal justice. The findings confirm the two-dimensional structure of the construct and demonstrate satisfactory psychometric properties of the Ukrainian version of the questionnaire, opening prospects for research on justice beliefs among the Ukrainian-speaking population, including in cross-cultural studies.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- Psychology, Society & Education
- Publisher
- UCOPress. Universidad de Córdoba
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal retains the economic copyright of contributions that are accepted for publication. This means that it acquires the exclusive use of the document to be edited, disseminated, preserved, etc. in any support and for the time stipulated by the local legislation that regulates the performance of the publication.
Psychology, Society & Education is published under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
References
Barreiro, A., Etchezahar, E., & Prado-Gasco, V. (2014). Creencia global en un mundo justo: validación de la Escala de Lipkus en estudiantes universitarios de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Interdisciplinaria, 31(1), 57-72.
Bègue, L., & Bastounis, M. (2003). Two spheres of belief in a just world: extensive support for the dimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71, 435-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7103007
Clifton, J. D. W., Baker, J. D., Park, C. L., Yaden, D. B., Clifton, A. B. W., Terni, P., Miller, J. L., Zeng, G., Giorgi, S., Schwartz, H. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2018). Primal world beliefs. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000639
Correia, D., & Dalbert, C. (2007). Medindo crença no mundo justo pessoal e geral: adaptação de uma escala ao contexto brasileiro. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 36(1), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.4989
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: about the personal belief in a Just World Scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047
Dalbert, C. (2000). Beliefs in a just world questionnaire, In J. Maltby, C. A. Lewis, & A. Hill (Eds.), Commissioned reviews of 250 psychological tests (pp. 461-465). Edwin Mellen Press.
Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3383-9
Dalbert, C. (2002). GWPER. Persönliche Gerechte-Welt-Skala, [Verfahrensdokumentation, Autorenbeschreibung, Fragebogen Deutsch und Englisch]. Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6543
Dalbert, C., & Katona-Sallay, H. (1996). The “belief in a just world” construct in Hungary. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(3), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022196273003
Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an die gerechte Welt als Motiv: validierung zweier Skalen. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596-615.
Donat, M., Wolgast, A., et al. (2025). Further evidence for the latent structure and relationship between belief in a just world and subjective well-being: a commentary on the latent factor approach by Hafer et al. (2020). Social Justice Research, 38, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-025-00449-1
Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: about the beliefs in a just world’s impact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 732-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00240.x
Esposito, C., Di Martino, S., Arcidiacono, C., & Di Napoli, I. (2022). Is the world a just place? The Italian adaptation of the personal and general belief in a just world scales. Social Justice Research, 36(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00401-7
Fatima, I., & Khalid, R. (2007). Some aspects of reliability and validity of beliefs in a just world questionnaire. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 15-24.
Gouveia, V. V., Nascimento, A. M., Gouveia, R. S. V., Medeiros, E. D., Fonsêca, P. N., & Santos, L. C. O. (2018). Medindo crença no mundo justo pessoal e geral: adaptação de uma escala ao contexto brasileiro. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 36(1), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.4989
Hafer, C. L., Busseri, M. A., Rubel, A. N., Drolet, C. E., & Cherrington, J. N. (2020). A latent factor approach to belief in a just world and its association with well-being. Social Justice Research, 33, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00342-8
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Harding, W. G., McConatha, J. T., & Kumar, V. K. (2020). The relationship between just world beliefs and life satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), Article 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176410
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Larionov, P., & Mudło-Głagolska, K. (2021). Polish adaptation of the personal and general belief in a just world scales. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia, 34(2), 245-264.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45 (1), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x
Lerner, M. (1980) The belief in a just world: a fundamental delusion. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5
Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional Belief in a Just World Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), 1171-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666-677.
Lucas, T., Strelan, P., Karremans, J. C., Sutton, R. M., Najmi, E., & Malik, Z. (2018). When does priming justice promote forgiveness? On the importance of distributive and procedural justice for self and others. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(5), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1303533
Lucas, T., Zhdanova, L., & Alexander, S. (2011). Procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others: assessment of a four-factor individual differences model. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000032
Mikani, M., Rafiee, P., & Donat, M. (2022). Validation of the general and personal belief in a just world scales in Iran and their relations to perceived likelihood of kin favoritism. Current Psychology, 42, 26286-26299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03736-1
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Reich, B., & Wang, X. (2015). And justice for all: revisiting the Global Belief in a Just World Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.031
Ríos Rodríguez, M. L., Moreno Jiménez, P., & Hernández Ruiz, B. (2024). Validation of the Global Belief in a Just World Scale within the Spanish population. Tempus Psicológico, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/tempuspsi.7.1.5008.2024
Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65-89.
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010
Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Wilkin, K., Elder, T. J., Cole, J. M., & Stathi, S. (2008). Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 528-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312526
Sutton, R. M., Stoeber, J., & Kamble, S. V. (2017). Belief in a just world for oneself versus others, social goals, and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.026
Wu, M. S., Yan, X., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Li, J., & Han, B. (2010). General belief in a just world and resilience: evidence from a collectivistic culture. European Journal of Personality, 25(6), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.807